I bought an iPhone 13 on eBay from Worldsmartfone for $635.00 in June 2025 that was advertised as brand new . A year later, Apple confirmed it had actually been activated in 2022 , meaning it was used/refurbished . )n 6th July, when I informed eBay, they removed the seller’s listing immediately. From then on, every normal eBay support path failed to get me a refund eBay bots blocked me due to the 30‑day limit for returns Chat support repeated scripted responses saying the same thing. PayPal could not help due to their time limits The seller initially agreed to refund me but then stalled and ignored me. I could not find any way to speak to someone in eBay – either by phone or email. On 27th July, I sent a registered mail complaint to eBay’s Head office in Sydney, giving the concrete evidence I had regarding misrepresentation & reminding them that under Australian Consumer Law (ACL) , misrepresentation has no time limit , and that their platform policies don’t override ACL. The response was another roadblock – on 19th August, eBay stating they were not responsible for refunding the money and that they could not force Worldsmartfone to do so. I took some free legal advice & wrote back to eBay saying they did have a responsibility under ACL for the seller to comply and that I would refer the matter to the ACCC. I said I was prepared to keep the used iPhone if they were prepared to refund me the difference between the cost of a new iPhone and a refurbished one - $235.00. Within 2 days, on 1st September, eBay refunded me $235.00 . Key takeaways: If your complaint falls outside of normal eBay support timelines, don't waste your time trying to go through their normal support systems. Go directly to registered mail. Use ACL language if appropriate, be reasonable, and mention ACCC escalation. eBay will act once the case reaches the right level of support.