topic Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort. in Community Spirit

Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

silverfaun — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:00:29 GMT

Julia Gillard, even out of Parliament, is stalked by the crooked rorting by partner Tim.

Here she is, after having tried to cover up Tims rorting for months, finally exposed. Hundreds of thousands of taxpayers dollars & man hours wasted by Gillard trying to cover it up.

Over $4000 she's had to pay for Tims travel all over the state flogging off products.

Where is this de fecto anyway? living on his block in a caravan? even his own family don't have anything to do with him & yet the Prime Minister of Australia ensconced him into the Lodge.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

izabsmiling — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:00:52 GMT

you may be best to find some proof or info to go with this considering what the claims are made in the opening post ?

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

jethro_woolfe — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:01:24 GMT

@silverfaun wrote:

Julia Gillard, even out of Parliament, is stalked by the crooked rorting by partner Tim.

Here she is, after having tried to cover up Tims rorting for months, finally exposed. Hundreds of thousands of taxpayers dollars & man hours wasted by Gillard trying to cover it up.

Over $4000 she's had to pay for Tims travel all over the state flogging off products.

Where is this de fecto anyway? living on his block in a caravan? even his own family don't have anything to do with him & yet the Prime Minister of Australia ensconced him into the Lodge

What sordid petty gossip. i think it better you turn attention toward the current parliament. Ms Gillard isn't going to get you through.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

*crikey*mate* — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:01:47 GMT

There is no space between the last word of a sentence and the punctuation mark.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

izabsmiling — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:01:59 GMT

quote:this happens sometimes ...when spaces aren't left

edited:it didn't work ? somethimes emoticons appear ?

anyway there are and will be spaces in my posts ..wherever I want them to be

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

pct001wine — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:02:19 GMT

It amazes me that, post-election, the liberal acolytes continue to be engrossed by the supposed actions of the previous PM and her partner.

What a sensationalist diatribe, long on bitterness and hatred, short on facts and relevance. It's the sort of thing pickering would be proud of.

Is this an attempt to deflect the thinking populace from the actions (or inactions) of the current Government ?

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

jean2579 — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:12:14 GMT

Silver faun, could you please clarify your concerns
1. They were in a de facto arrangement
2. He joined h.is partner in their home
3. He has a caravan
4. The caravan is parked on a block of land that he owns
5. That he worked selling products
6. That he made an error in using a car
7. That his partner covered the cost when fit became known.
Does the name Peter Reith ring any bells with you and the $20,000 telephone bill of his son that he covered?

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

freddie*rooster — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:17:04 GMT

What on earth is this thread about, there's 6 edit's. If a thread requires that many mod edits it needs to be scrapped altogether.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

debra9275 — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:25:39 GMT

oh I see lol

why are we even discussing them any more, they are gone, I'm more concerned with what's happening now

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

jean2579 — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:26:22 GMT

Couldn't agree more Freddie

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

lyndal1838 — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:39:11 GMT

Freddie, if an OP is edited by the Mods then any posts already on the thread will show as being edited also.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

not_an_eloi — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:15:23 GMT

abbrott failed to declare a flamin' huge $710,000 personal loan, pecuniary interest, wotacrook

btw, timbo's in reg'lar contact with the daughters, sort of pus-oozin' fabrication that one would read

at pickerings joint.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

cherry*135 — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:06:08 GMT

Got any facts on this topic OP? Even so, if you do, why are you so obsessed with JG (no longer Prime Minister of Australia) and in particular her partner Tim?

Your past assumptions that Tim had shot through and living in his caravan were incorrect.

I hope Julia & Tim are very happy in their swanky newly purchased house in Adelaide.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

cherry*135 — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:14:19 GMT

Controversy over the alleged misuse of taxpayer-funded entitlements has dogged parliamentarians this year.

Former Speaker Peter Slipper has pleaded not guilty over the alleged misuse of about $1200 in taxpayer-funded Cabcharge dockets to visit Canberra wineries in 2010.

Mr Slipper, who was investigated by Australian Federal Police, repeatedly claimed that the prosecution was unfair as he was being treated differently from other parliamentarians, including Tony Abbott, who repaid a claim for travel expenses incurred while promoting a book.

In Victoria, the state ombudsman's findings over alleged misuse by independent MP Geoff Shaw of his taxpayer-funded car in the day-to-day running of his hardware company has led to a political crisis and an ongoing police probe. Mr Shaw holds the balance of power.

Victorian Labor legal affairs spokesman Martin Pakula said last week that a closed parliamentary hearing into the alleged misuse by Mr Shaw was wrong as "nobody is going to know how rigorously these matters have been pursued".

"All that we will hear is a verdict from the committee," Mr Pakula said. "Geoff Shaw should get a real grilling from all members of the committee."

- See more at: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/tim-mathiesons-car-use-cost-julia-gillard-4000/story-fn59niix-1226720523293#sthash.ZxEIBDIA.dpuf

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

freakiness — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:55:28 GMT

@silverfaun wrote:
Julia Gillard, even out of Parliament, is stalked by the crooked rorting by partner Tim.

Here she is, after having tried to cover up Tims rorting for months, finally exposed. Hundreds of thousands of taxpayers dollars & man hours wasted by Gillard trying to cover it up.
Over $4000 she's had to pay for Tims travel all over the state flogging off products.

Where is this de fecto anyway? living on his block in a caravan? even his own family don't have anything to do with him & yet the Prime Minister of Australia ensconced him into the Lodge.

Wow, a measly $4000 pay back.

Where's your thread expressing outrage at Tony Abbott being ordered to pay back more than twice that?

or your outrage at Joe Hockey for failing to declare his wife's interests?

Or your thread of outrage over the Victorian that's been charged with Fraud over allowances

or the Qld member who like to dangle in wine?

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

freakiness — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 05:15:59 GMT

Yeah, like something from looney tunes.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

the_great_she_elephant — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 05:09:47 GMT

Got any facts on this topic OP? Even so, if you do, why are you so obsessed with JG (no longer Prime Minister of Australia) and in particular her partner Tim?

Facts would be superfluous to her argument - it's all there in the title.The deliberate reference to the former Prime Minister as Miss Gillard, tells us more than we could ever wish to know about the OP's agenda, attitude and state of mind.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

freddie*rooster — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 05:32:21 GMT

@lyndal1838 wrote:
Freddie, if an OP is edited by the Mods then any posts already on the thread will show as being edited also.

Oh OK thanks Lyndal.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

spotweldersfriend — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:37:13 GMT

Peter 'Children Overboard' Reith's phonecard rort was actually $50,000.

Re: Miss Gillard to pay for Tim's rort.

i-need-a-martini — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:23:53 GMT

One the one hand we have a potential misuse of funds that was reported by the person responsible (Gillard) who then paid for the discrepancy once realised.

On the other hand we have a Prime Minister who uses tax payers money to pay for his attendance and participation in charity events or personal activities whilst pretending to do them from the goodness of his heart.

Hmm...let's see...which one do I find most reprehensible...?