topic Re: Who to believe? in Community Spirit

Who to believe?

lakeland27 — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 06:59:51 GMT

David Suzuki or Andrew Bolt ?

i tend to go with Suzuki, he has the qualifications and expertise in his field. Andrew is a journalist, not even a good journalist ..with only a sketchy grasp of climate denial, he doesn't really even have a proper grasp of what he's talking about.

when you have a toothache, don't go to andrew. go to a dentist. when climate is the field, go to Suzuki.

Re: Who to believe?

j*oono — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:07:06 GMT

I tend to agree with you Lakeland.

By the way. Did you know that Bolt is on tv twice on Sundays

Re: Who to believe?

lakeland27 — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:11:52 GMT

@j*oono wrote:
I tend to agree with you Lakeland.

By the way. Did you know that Bolt is on tv twice on Sundays

yes i did, did you know that the program he replaced, 'video hits' was one of the few programs Ten actually made a profit on ? the board were aware of the impending losses, and Ms Rinehart agreed to pay the lost revenue out her own pocket (although it seems she is reluctant to pay) . what it means is that "The bolt Report'' is actually paid propoganda, and not a 'show' in any real sense

Re: Who to believe?

donnashuggy — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:12:38 GMT

He is also very calm, I like that in a person

Re: Who to believe?

siggie-reported-by-alarmists — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:17:58 GMT

David Suzuki has no qualifications in Climatology, so no I wouldn't go to him...

Andrew Bolt can only quote and comment on the ridiculously embarrassing statements made by David Suzuki,....as can I.....giggle.

Re: Who to believe?

azureline** — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:27:23 GMT

Didn't someone once call Bolt the village idiot?

Re: Who to believe?

lakeland27 — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:34:05 GMT

@azureline** wrote:
Didn't someone once call Bolt the village idiot?

many times. his attempts to smear suzuki make him appear a desperate troll at best. especially with julia Gillard gone, now he's turning back to topics he knows little about. fortunately for him he can continue to make stuff up, or steal it off other bottom feeders.

Re: Who to believe?

siggie-reported-by-alarmists — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:36:30 GMT

@lakeland27 wrote:
@azureline** wrote:
Didn't someone once call Bolt the village idiot?
many times. his attempts to smear suzuki make him appear a desperate troll at best. especially with julia Gillard gone, now he's turning back to topics he knows little about. fortunately for him he can continue to make stuff up, or steal it off other bottom feeders.

So.....you are calling David Suzuki a "bottom feeder".....noted....

Re: Who to believe?

lakeland27 — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:37:19 GMT

try to keep up, bolt and other bottom feeders.

Re: Who to believe?

j*oono — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:38:29 GMT

@azureline** wrote:
Didn't someone once call Bolt the village idiot?

Yes, many have but his fan based villagers give him a run for his money.

Re: Who to believe?

not_an_eloi — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:57:14 GMT

a blow by blow de-bunk of dolt's quotes, rants, how he's proven time after time, to be wrong :

Andrew Bolt's Lies, Deceptions & Misrepresentations on AGW
A catalogue of his scientific illiteracy

About

"Andrew Bolt has been misrepresenting, deceiving and lying about AGW as an issue for a long time now.

He has denigrated science and scientists with apparently no accountability.

He has refused to admit error or to correct misconceptions that he has created.

This blog is to set the record straight and to put on the record how disingenuous and politically-motivated this individual has been in relation to a subject that he very clearly has very little grasp or understanding.

For those real sceptics that would like scientifically based information on the contentious climate change issues, I recommend SkepticalScience.

One of the best resources for answering questions on climate science issues is RealClimate."

http://andrewboltliesdeceptionsonagw.wordpress.com

Re: Who to believe?

freakiness — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:48:10 GMT

@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
David Suzuki has no qualifications in Climatology, so no I wouldn't go to him...

Andrew Bolt can only quote and comment on the ridiculously embarrassing statements made by David Suzuki,....as can I.....giggle.

What would your qualifications be, since you consider yourself to be more learned in the subject?

Re: Who to believe?

polksaladallie — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:50:02 GMT

Bolt couldn't even complete a basic university degree. (Love to know the story behind that). So he is a half-baked journalist IMO.

Re: Who to believe?

siggie-reported-by-alarmists — Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:01:24 GMT

When Andrew Bolt produces headlines like -

David Suzuki proves he’s pig ignorant about global warming

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/david_suzuki_proves_hes_pig_ignorant_about_global_warming/

I must admit I do giggle...just a bit....

Re: Who to believe?

***super_nova*** — Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:44:47 GMT

I think we should just ignore the shrill, hysterically shrieking, Bolt quoting posters, and maybe they just go away.

Or maybe not; anybody who was not sure about what to think about climate change may after reading their ravings start having doubts about the deniers mental state 🙂

Re: Who to believe?

*ibis — Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:02:20 GMT

the shrill, hysterically shrieking, Bolt quoting posters