topic Re: Women with tattoos. in Community Spirit

Women with tattoos.

ecar3483 — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 12:50:47 GMT

Like the tatts? Hate the tatts? Yeah, whatever, it's their choice...?

Discuss, enlighten me with your views.

Re: Women with tattoos.

chuk_77 — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 12:59:12 GMT

how is it different to men with tatts?

Re: Women with tattoos.

joz*garage — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:10:45 GMT

women with tatts look like cheap scared savages to me

Re: Women with tattoos.

harley_babes_hoard — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:47:15 GMT

Get with the times Joz, plenty of woman have beautiful artwork of them these days.
I'm getting another one very soon.

Re: Women with tattoos.

joz*garage — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 14:13:52 GMT

maybe people with tatts should get with the times, hbh, decorating oneself was a tribal thing

personally ive never found women with tatts attractive, more a turn off

each to their own

Re: Women with tattoos.

jimmy*part4 — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 14:31:12 GMT

I don't like them either. It looks ok on a biker or a heavy metal band member. Seeing as I won't be sleeping with any of them, I don't care, lol.

I won't get one. What happens if the second to last thing you ever do is carving one off yourself to prevent being indentified? It could happen.

Re: Women with tattoos.

electric*mayhem*band — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:58:29 GMT

Plenty of TV programmes depicting the horrors of tattooing, and the people who succumbed to having them, now regretting it later on. 'Bodyshockers', 'My Tattoo Hell', etc. I don't like tattoos period, whether on males or females. In later years when the skin has sagged and ink has bled and run, maybe folk who think it's 'cool' now, will have second thoughts. Too late was the cry.

Anyway as someone has already said, 'each to his/her own'.

Re: Women with tattoos.

onau702 — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 21:42:09 GMT

Sure, i guess. I mean if I like the artwork, the picture or design, yeah, I'd like the tattoo. Just so long as it's not on the breasts or bum, those things look good enough already and I see no reason to cover them up.

Re: Women with tattoos.

harley_babes_hoard — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 22:08:13 GMT

I can't see anything wrong with this

Re: Women with tattoos.

lionrose.7 — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 23:10:15 GMT

I have two small Tatts, one on each hip, no one but my doctors can see them.

First one was a small four leaf clover, went out to lunch for a girl friends birthday and met a female Tattoo artist, the rest is history.

We still laugh at our matching Tatts.

Second one my Grand daughter in Perth arranged for us to have a tattoo together, this one is the Breast cancer ribbon with a moon and a star.

Both are small and I like them, will never get another one.

Re: Women with tattoos.

onau702 — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 23:31:42 GMT

I like tattoos that are easy to identify at a glance, Some get alot of them and they kinda blur together so you have to go up close and focus to see what it is, or ask them. Or they get them where they sunburn or tan and that kinda messes it up for me, look like dark blobs, thats all I can tell.

Re: Women with tattoos.

tulip*place — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:35:05 GMT

A small indiscreet one is ok. Don't think it looks particulary nice on a bride walking down the aisle in a beautiful flowing gown and long train and then you see a tatoo on her back. Spoils the whole look IMO.

Re: Women with tattoos.

j*oono — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:48:35 GMT

I don't particularly like them but some of them look quite nice. One I saw was a girl with a small one on the inside of her wrist and I quite liked that. Hate the ones on the back, especially angels wings and the bogan southern cross above a man's heart. Chinese writing (bogan) and a particularly revolting one was a young girl in a short skirt and she had tattooed seamed floral stockings up the back of both legs.

My son has a tattoo. One quite large one by a professional and a very small one that can't be seen easily when he allowed his friend that was learning the art to practice on him. That one makes me laugh and I don't think he will have that much to drink again.

Re: Women with tattoos.

gleee58 — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:49:09 GMT

@ecar3483 wrote:
Like the tatts? Hate the tatts? Yeah, whatever, it's their choice...?
Discuss, enlighten me with your views.

Ooh, lookie lookie. Another "let's attack women" thread.

Nothing like a bit of everyday sexism to start the weekend.

What sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on women?

Re: Women with tattoos.

onau702 — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:01:11 GMT

Didn't seem that way to me, are you sure your not reading more into it then is there?

Re: Women with tattoos.

monman12 — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:20:41 GMT

"What sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on women?" Oh dear !

Not every time a subject here that involves women actually represents an "attack" upon them, in fact what sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on those who wish to debate a topic such as this. One, I might add, that has been mulled over a few times here, and in CW, during past years.

My view is: why on earth permanently graffiti what is beautiful, a woman's body. There is no point in attempting to guild the Lily, or Jane, or Anne etc, etc.

Re: Women with tattoos.

gleee58 — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:21:56 GMT

@onau702 wrote:
Didn't seem that way to me, are you sure your not reading more into it then is there?

Look at the title. It's about women. It's about judging women. It's about looking at them and forming a judgement.

Why do you think it's ok to talk about women as if they're an object like a car or a piece of furniture?

Re: Women with tattoos.

gleee58 — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:27:24 GMT

@monman12 wrote:
"What sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on women?" Oh dear !

Not every time a subject here that involves women actually represents an "attack" upon them, in fact what sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on those who wish to debate a topic such as this. One, I might add, that has been mulled over a few times here, and in CW, during past years.

My view is: why on earth permanently graffiti what is beautiful, a woman's body. There is no point in attempting to guild the Lily, or Jane, or Anne etc, etc.

It is an invitation to attack women. Nothing more, nothing less.

This is not debating. It's purely a means to put some women for the amusement of other people.

What women choose to do with their bodies is their own business. Their body is their own. It doesn't belong to those who think it's their right to perve. If you want to perve pay the dosh and go to a strip show or if you have a female partner go perve on them.

Re: Women with tattoos.

watta*drama*queen — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:38:48 GMT

@monman12 wrote:
"What sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on women?" Oh dear !

Not every time a subject here that involves women actually represents an "attack" upon them, in fact what sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on those who wish to debate a topic such as this. One, I might add, that has been mulled over a few times here, and in CW, during past years.

My view is: why on earth permanently graffiti what is beautiful, a woman's body. There is no point in attempting to guild the Lily, or Jane, or Anne etc, etc.

What sort of inadequacy causes a person to introduce sexism to derail this thread ?

An inadequacy of their own perhaps .

Sad really

Re: Women with tattoos.

onau702 — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:42:14 GMT

I guess I didn't see it that way, but then I'm not looking for reasons to get offended. Would it be better if the subject was men with tattoos? Or kids under the age of 14 with tattoos? "Parrents who allow their children get inked" I don't know. Skin art, what can ya do?