topic Baby #3 for Cambridges in Community Spirit

Baby #3 for Cambridges

icyfroth — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 01:59:07 GMT

Kensington Palace announces third royal baby on the way

THE Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting a third child who will be fifth in line to the British throne.

Kensington Palace announced the news on Monday, saying that the Queen and rest of the Royal Family are delighted.

The Duchess is suffering from an extreme form of morning sickness, as she did with previous pregnancies.

She has been forced to cancel her planned engagement at a London children"s hospital today and is being cared for at Kensington Palace.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

davidc4430 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 02:18:12 GMT

Oh dear, was it planned?

i guess dad will need a second job to cover the bills.

maybe night security at bucks palace? i believe hes in with the owners so that might help.

will have to boot that no hoper brother outta the spare room, gonna need the extra space.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

Anonymous — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 02:37:11 GMT

Hope it ain't twins

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

bushies.girl — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 02:42:51 GMT

@Anonymous wrote:
Hope it ain't twins

Funny you should say that, I was thinking the same thing

Dont envy her re morning sickness 😞

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

lind9650 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 03:54:47 GMT

@davidc4430 wrote:
Oh dear, was it planned?
i guess dad will need a second job to cover the bills.
maybe night security at bucks palace? i believe hes in with the owners so that might help.
will have to boot that no hoper brother outta the spare room, gonna need the extra space.

Why so sarcastic, David?

The brother has served two stints in Afghanistan and taken over a lot of his late mothers charity work. I would not call him a no hoper.

Erica

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

bushies.girl — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 04:07:04 GMT

@lind9650 wrote:
@davidc4430 wrote:
Oh dear, was it planned?
i guess dad will need a second job to cover the bills.
maybe night security at bucks palace? i believe hes in with the owners so that might help.
will have to boot that no hoper brother outta the spare room, gonna need the extra space.
Why so sarcastic, David?
The brother has served two stints in Afghanistan and taken over a lot of his late mothers charity work. I would not call him a no hoper.

Erica
@lind9650 wrote:
@davidc4430 wrote:
Oh dear, was it planned?
i guess dad will need a second job to cover the bills.
maybe night security at bucks palace? i believe hes in with the owners so that might help.
will have to boot that no hoper brother outta the spare room, gonna need the extra space.
Why so sarcastic, David?
The brother has served two stints in Afghanistan and taken over a lot of his late mothers charity work. I would not call him a no hoper.

Erica

Ummmm think it may have been said "tongue in cheek" lol

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

janeababe — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 04:13:22 GMT

Well, I'm chuffed

I think they are great parents, do a wonderful job, and I hope that young Kate recovers quickly from her morning sickness.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

lind9650 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 04:19:41 GMT

Sorry, bushies.girl.

I'm not often on the computer anymore, but this is not Davids usual style as far as I can remember.

Erica

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

bushies.girl — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 04:42:22 GMT

@lind9650 wrote:
Sorry, bushies.girl.
I'm not often on the computer anymore, but this is not Davids usual style as far as I can remember.

Erica

Maybe you have missed it in the past Erica

Am thinking that (perhaps ) like myself, David is not a royalist, hence his comments, which, bty, I found quite amusing

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

lyndal1838 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 05:09:41 GMT

@lind9650 wrote:
@davidc4430 wrote:
Oh dear, was it planned?
i guess dad will need a second job to cover the bills.
maybe night security at bucks palace? i believe hes in with the owners so that might help.
will have to boot that no hoper brother outta the spare room, gonna need the extra space.
Why so sarcastic, David?
The brother has served two stints in Afghanistan and taken over a lot of his late mothers charity work. I would not call him a no hoper.

Erica

Tongue in cheek or not, this is very much David's posting style these days.

It is unfortunate that he only seems to make negative comments about any stories he posts.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

davidc4430 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 06:30:35 GMT

funny that, sounds like what i was getting told before i had me holiday.

i cant control what people think.

i can also not change my sense of humour, it is what it is.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

davidc4430 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 06:33:48 GMT

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

janeababe — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 06:46:20 GMT

@lyndal1838 wrote:
@lind9650 wrote:
@davidc4430 wrote:
Oh dear, was it planned?
i guess dad will need a second job to cover the bills.
maybe night security at bucks palace? i believe hes in with the owners so that might help.
will have to boot that no hoper brother outta the spare room, gonna need the extra space.
Why so sarcastic, David?
The brother has served two stints in Afghanistan and taken over a lot of his late mothers charity work. I would not call him a no hoper.

Erica
Tongue in cheek or not, this is very much David's posting style these days.
It is unfortunate that he only seems to make negative comments about any stories he posts.

...........ahhh, Lyn, but it was Icy who posted it..... funny that!

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

lyndal1838 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 07:19:27 GMT

True, but Icy did not make any negative comments about the story....David chose to do so.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

icyfroth — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:08:59 GMT

Royal or commoner, who doesn't love a new baby?

I do feel sorry for her she's going through that morning sickness again like when she was carrying George. Maybe it'll be another boy?

Now it'll be on with guessing what the new bub's name will be.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

bushies.girl — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:12:26 GMT

@davidc4430 wrote:
funny that, sounds like what i was getting told before i had me holiday.

i cant control what people think.

i can also not change my sense of humour, it is what it is.

No one is forced to read your posts but they cannot seem to help themselves lol

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

davidc4430 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:36:48 GMT

For what its worth i'm neither for or against the british royal family.

it sadens me to think how much money they cost when their are so many poor in britain.

i also dont believe they have a role here in australia besides being a novelty of a bygone era.

they do seem to be loved by a lot of people.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

bushies.girl — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:19:20 GMT

It saddens me thta thye have so much, when others have so little 😞

Women fall pregnant/give birth every minute of every day, so dunno what makes this baby any more special than any other baby.

I am anti royals, always have been, always will be .....

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

zanadoo_56 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:38:03 GMT

@bushies.girl wrote:
It saddens me thta thye have so much, when others have so little 😞

Women fall pregnant/give birth every minute of every day, so dunno what makes this baby any more special than any other baby.

I am anti royals, always have been, always will be .....

Oh well, he was born into money and she married into it. It's the way things go.

I've never seen babies as particularly special, but then I don't have a maternal bone in my body. I'm always interested in what names kids end up with these days though...but then again I'd ask the same question about any pets a family might have. 😉

I'm more don't mess with the status quo if it aint broke, than an actual royalist. They can't be worse than the ineffectual weasels we've got in our current government and opposition, none of which IMO deserve to be in charge of an Oz republic.

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

bright.ton42 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:49:54 GMT

@zanadoo_56 wrote:
@bushies.girl wrote:
It saddens me thta thye have so much, when others have so little 😞

Women fall pregnant/give birth every minute of every day, so dunno what makes this baby any more special than any other baby.

I am anti royals, always have been, always will be .....
Oh well, he was born into money and she married into it. It's the way things go.

I've never seen babies as particularly special, but then I don't have a maternal bone in my body. I'm always interested in what names kids end up with these days though...but then again I'd ask the same question about any pets a family might have. 😉

I'm more don't mess with the status quo if it aint broke, than an actual royalist. They can't be worse than the ineffectual weasels we've got in our current government and opposition, none of which IMO deserve to be in charge of an Oz republic.
Loving your honesty... 😉