<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can we define 'free' returns yet? in Selling</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Selling/Can-we-define-free-returns-yet/m-p/2065857#M154789</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There's no mention of restocking fees in the announcement, so unfortunately it's hard to say. I think some changes to the return process may be implemented (this is from the US update, so we may wait a little longer for it, if they introduce the same options here), but they only really address what happens when you provide a free return and the item doesn't come back in the same condition: "Starting this fall, sellers who offer free returns can decide if they want to offer less than a full refund in cases where an item is returned that is not in the same condition that it was in when you shipped it (e.g., a damaged item or an open-box return)."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take that to mean you can offer free returns, have no restocking fee enabled, but still deduct money from a COM return if the item comes back damaged, while still qualifying to be found under the free returns filter they'll add.&amp;nbsp;That would mean, without a restocking fee, you'd still be out postage costs, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm guessing they expect sellers will add a little on to all&amp;nbsp;item prices to cover paying for the returns that happen - the illusion of free, AKA the benefit of getting other people to contribute the cost&amp;nbsp;for 1 person to have the illusion of free.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyvery-happy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyvery-happy" src="https://community.ebay.com.au/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.png" alt="Smiley Very Happy" title="Smiley Very Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>digital*ghost</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-08T10:13:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can we define 'free' returns yet?</title>
      <link>https://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Selling/Can-we-define-free-returns-yet/m-p/2065821#M154778</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With the changes to return policy I am considering taking the tradeoff of more visibility and offering free returns. But I don't want to screw myself over, obviously...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does 'free' returns refer only to seller-paid return postage? Will charging a restocking fee be considered not a free return?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With free returns for change of mind, am I also forced to refund original postage or will I at least only be paying the return and not refunding the original?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw the option to return for merchandise credit, does anyone actually do this? I''ve not yet done a return with this enabled, will it just give me the option to issue credit rather than refund in the dispute manager? If so, that would make this thing a lot easier to swallow,&amp;nbsp;I pay almost nothing for my stock, so essentially giving away an item or two, and thus recouping the original postage cost, would be quite alright for me...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Selling/Can-we-define-free-returns-yet/m-p/2065821#M154778</guid>
      <dc:creator>van_werkhoven</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-08T08:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can we define 'free' returns yet?</title>
      <link>https://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Selling/Can-we-define-free-returns-yet/m-p/2065857#M154789</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There's no mention of restocking fees in the announcement, so unfortunately it's hard to say. I think some changes to the return process may be implemented (this is from the US update, so we may wait a little longer for it, if they introduce the same options here), but they only really address what happens when you provide a free return and the item doesn't come back in the same condition: "Starting this fall, sellers who offer free returns can decide if they want to offer less than a full refund in cases where an item is returned that is not in the same condition that it was in when you shipped it (e.g., a damaged item or an open-box return)."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take that to mean you can offer free returns, have no restocking fee enabled, but still deduct money from a COM return if the item comes back damaged, while still qualifying to be found under the free returns filter they'll add.&amp;nbsp;That would mean, without a restocking fee, you'd still be out postage costs, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm guessing they expect sellers will add a little on to all&amp;nbsp;item prices to cover paying for the returns that happen - the illusion of free, AKA the benefit of getting other people to contribute the cost&amp;nbsp;for 1 person to have the illusion of free.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyvery-happy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyvery-happy" src="https://community.ebay.com.au/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.png" alt="Smiley Very Happy" title="Smiley Very Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Selling/Can-we-define-free-returns-yet/m-p/2065857#M154789</guid>
      <dc:creator>digital*ghost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-08T10:13:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

