on 28-12-2013 08:32 AM
It really is very simple. There is CO2 in the atmosphere but the amount is normally static; there is an equilibrium. But since the start of industrial revolution it has been steadily increasing. Why does as little as few percent make difference?
Imagine you have a large tub almost full of water. There is a tap running 100 litres per day into it, and on the bottom is a drain that takes away 100litres. Therefore the level stays the same. If you increase the water coming in by only 1%, it will add 101 litre per day, if the output stays the same, the water will slowly start rising, and one day it will overflow.
on 28-12-2013 08:53 PM
i must admit to recieving discounts on oxo cubes
on 28-12-2013 08:56 PM
Just a discount ?? Are they not given away free for life to each staunch convert?
on 28-12-2013 09:00 PM
on 28-12-2013 09:03 PM
on 28-12-2013 09:09 PM
People are less prone to complaint if the taxes are tethered to an emotive ideal, like saving the planet.
As is perfectly obvious from currentnt tremds
on 28-12-2013 09:12 PM
on 28-12-2013 09:20 PM
A very astute observation on your part Spot, isnt is strange that all addictions and necessities are taxed heavily
on 28-12-2013 09:26 PM
on 28-12-2013 09:27 PM
on 28-12-2013 09:34 PM
Stopping excessive polution has my vote, but CO2 is not a pollutant regardless of what you have been led to believe.
Land, River, and Ocean pollition in a much more serious problem.