Decisions, decisions

[the*scarlet*pimpernel]

Do I watch Schapelle or Inxs tonight? But rude running them at the same time I reckon.

[the*scarlet*pimpernel]

Well I ended up in my luxurious pool. It's been hovering around 39 degrees all day. Then we went and cleaned out the trough down the paddock and refilled it so the wildlife have water (we don't have any stock). Then we spotted Tom the koala on his way back to the house tree so I had to feed and tie the dog up. Then we threw some chops on the barby, and now we have just come inside and American Pie is on. So it wasn't such a hard decision after all. We didn't watch any of them

[cherry*135]

I watched the Schapelle program. It was long & drawn out and didn't show anything that people wouldn't already know (probably because Schapelle had no input into it, so they just had to go with what has already been reported).

They did make assumptions towards the end that her father and Malcolm McCauley (? convicted drug dealer) were involved.

Which might just led to the Corby family sueing Ch9 now, as they are suing the author of the book Sins of the Father for the same assumption.. that her father was involved in drugs.

[freakiness]

---

@am*3 wrote:

I watched the Schapelle program. It was long & drawn out and didn't show anything that people wouldn't already know (probably because Schapelle had no input into it, so they just had to go with what has already been reported).

They did make assumptions towards the end that her father and Malcolm McCauley (? convicted drug dealer) were involved.

Which might just led to the Corby family sueing Ch9 now, as they are suing the author of the book Sins of the Father for the same assumption.. that her father was involved in drugs.

---

Was it her dad packing the drugs in the first scene or McCauley?

[cq_tech]

Makes it pretty easy to alter the facts to suit the story when the person involved is dead and no longer has any right of reply. 😞

[freakiness]

---

@cq_tech wrote:
Makes it pretty easy to alter the facts to suit the story when the person involved is dead and no longer has any right of reply. 😞

---

Yeah. I don't know what that was all about as I just caught it in passing.  Some man was packing pot in the plastic bag and put it in a suitcase.  I should have taken more notice  😄    Nah, not really.  

[j*oono]

---

@cq_tech wrote:
Makes it pretty easy to alter the facts to suit the story when the person involved is dead and no longer has any right of reply. 😞

---

That can be said for both Schapelle's dad and also for Michael Hutchence.  

[cq_tech]

Indeed j*oono, which is precisely the reason I watched neither program last night.

[debra9275]

---

@crikey*mate wrote:

i dont have a tv

---

you should get one. I find it stops oneself from talking to oneself 

[bluecat*dancing]

We recorded INXS and Rake while we watched a Sons of Anarchy DVD.

[1966kelso]

LOL, like your style ablue cat. Um, what is rake?