16-05-2014 10:45 AM - edited 16-05-2014 10:45 AM
No not that house... the TV show House Rules.
Who's been watching that so far?
Who makes you want to through something through the TV at them?
on 25-06-2014 12:44 PM
on 25-06-2014 01:08 PM
Just been to Gloria Jeans for a coffee and I read the latest mags while there.
It is definite that they have split but they also have another home. They are in the hands of solicitors.
Also, Carol & Russell have 2 other homes - a waterside house and a luxury apartment and that they didn't buy the house from Gumtree. They bought it direct from the owner bypassing the real estate agents who had it advertised.
Lisa and Adam also have another house and all three of the finalists are worth money.
Bomber and Mel also had another house and had never lived in the one that was on the show - apparently they were accepted into the show then looked for a house to renovate.
The only true battlers were the ones from Tassie. This changes who I want to win - I'm not sure now. I like Lisa and Adams easy natures.
25-06-2014 01:21 PM - edited 25-06-2014 01:24 PM
assuming you believe Woman's Day, lol.
on 25-06-2014 05:05 PM
Regarding all the contestants barring the Tasmanian couple owning other houses, the Courier Mail had this on it's Facebook page.
JOHANNA Griggs, the host of Seven’s House Rules, has slammed rumours the couples aren’t the battlers they’ve been portrayed as, saying the claims are a “crock of **bleep**.”
Speaking with Jonesy and Amanda on WSFM 107.1 this morning, Griggs hit back at reports made in this week’s Woman’s Day that five out of the six couples own at least two properties - with one team reportedly amassing a $2.3 million portfolio.
“It’s absolute **bleep**,” said Griggs.
She went on to mention what she says are several anomalies in the magazine’s report.
“The apartment they claim is part of Carole and Russell’s $2.3 million portfolio, that’s the apartment Channel Seven put them in during the course of the filming when they’re not allowed in their homes,” she said.
But Griggs did concede they owned a second property that they bought it for $950,000 and is mortgaged for $850,000.
The Seven host also said the second home the mag claims is owned by Adam is a property he bought with his Dad in 2005.
“He sold his share in the house when he and Lisa decided to move into the home that they’ve bought together as an engaged couple.”
Griggs also said Candy and Ryan’s second property belongs to Ryan’s parents.
However, Lisa and Adam denied the claims, posting on their Facebook page:
“Well done to the rivalry station publication who has fabricated such lies. Not sure how you can get away with such rubbish.
“Once you have finished defaming - Can you please tell me where I can get the keys to my ‘other home’ and where we have been living for the past two years?!”
Apparently Womans Day is more a Ch 9 supporter magazine, as opposed to New Idea which is biased towards Ch 7.
on 25-06-2014 06:49 PM
Does it matter?
The show didn't start on the premise that any of the couples were "battlers". This is the first that I have heard the word mentioned.
on 25-06-2014 06:52 PM
on 25-06-2014 07:08 PM
no need to be snotty, she wasn't having a go at you, just discussing the article.
I really doubt anyone who owned over 2 million in property would put themselves through all that work - and if carole's heart isn't really invested in that house like she says it is then she is the world's best actress.
i want ryan and candy to go next, i would like to see carole and russell win but will be just as happy if adam and lisa take it out.
on 25-06-2014 07:24 PM
I wanted Carol and Russell to win before, but
Adam is just so happy all the time, I would like
Adam and Lisa to win. I think they are a lovely couple
on 25-06-2014 07:34 PM
I want Adam & Lisa to win as well.
They are a lovely, hardworking couple.
I just melt everytime Adam smiles
on 25-06-2014 07:41 PM
@i-need-a-martini wrote:Does it matter?
The show didn't start on the premise that any of the couples were "battlers". This is the first that I have heard the word mentioned.
exactly.