on 17-05-2015 10:19 PM
Surely not! After 10 months!! Is that all Reeva was worth?
He is now waiting for the South African prison authorities to decide whether to grant him conditional release, possibly from August.
I hope they listen to Reeva's mum and keep him in for the full 5 years.
He should have gotten more
on 09-06-2015 09:18 AM
The way that this farce has panned out, it won't be long until he'll be competing again. His trial was a cross between Gilbert & Sullivan's 'Trial By Jury', and the courtroom scene from 'Alice In Wonderland', and now this. Ten paltry months is tantamount to him getting off scot free. No wonder the Steenkamp family are furious.
on 09-06-2015 09:33 AM
@jessicadazzler wrote:
@imastawka wrote:Surely not! After 10 months!! Is that all Reeva was worth?
He is now waiting for the South African prison authorities to decide whether to grant him conditional release, possibly from August.
I hope they listen to Reeva's mum and keep him in for the full 5 years.
He should have gotten more
It was never 100% proved that he was guilty, was it??
Give us a break - he was convicted.
on 09-06-2015 09:35 AM
A lot of people are convicted that are then released years later having found they didn't do it.
on 09-06-2015 09:38 AM
@cmcoins2000 wrote:
@jessicadazzler wrote:
@imastawka wrote:Surely not! After 10 months!! Is that all Reeva was worth?
He is now waiting for the South African prison authorities to decide whether to grant him conditional release, possibly from August.
I hope they listen to Reeva's mum and keep him in for the full 5 years.
He should have gotten more
It was never 100% proved that he was guilty, was it??
Give us a break - he was convicted.
He was convicted of culpable homicide equivalent to manslaughter and sentenced to 5 years in prison.
on 09-06-2015 09:39 AM
@jessicadazzler wrote:A lot of people are convicted that are then released years later having found they didn't do it.
Do you even know the case?
09-06-2015 09:39 AM - edited 09-06-2015 09:40 AM
@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:
@jessicadazzler wrote:A lot of people are convicted that are then released years later having found they didn't do it.
Do you even know the case?
It was on TV morning & night for a while. I think I have a pretty good idea.
Edit: Unless you think I'm the hippie type that doesn't have a TV.
on 09-06-2015 09:47 AM
@jessicadazzler wrote:
@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:
@jessicadazzler wrote:A lot of people are convicted that are then released years later having found they didn't do it.
Do you even know the case?It was on TV morning & night for a while. I think I have a pretty good idea.
Edit: Unless you think I'm the hippie type that doesn't have a TV.
I dont have any opinion of you, so please dont try to bait me- Im not interested.
If you think you have a pretty good idea of the case, you would know that he was found guilty.
Theres no question he didnt do it.
on 09-06-2015 09:49 AM
@jessicadazzler wrote:A lot of people are convicted that are then released years later having found they didn't do it.
Are you for real ? If he didn't do, who did ? The Mad Hatter ?
on 09-06-2015 09:49 AM
Another example of women being less valuable than men. He should rot in prison for life.
10-06-2015 12:12 AM - edited 10-06-2015 12:13 AM