33 REPLIES 33

Re: Pickering

wareubin
Community Member

his website is delivered here most days by NW


 


Personnaly I've never noticed.


 


he was paid to harrass gillard.


 


And I'm sure you have some proof to back that statement. I'll wait till you post it.

Message 21 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering

his website is delivered here most days by NW


 


Personally I've never noticed.


 


That doesn't mean it doesn't happen here (reposting of his blog and cartoons), just because you haven't noticed it?


 


 

Message 22 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering

wareubin
Community Member

And of course the luvvies are big supporters of "If I dont like it no one else should see it" way of reasoning. So I do understand where all the looney lefties are coming from. But personally I don't give a crap what they think.

Message 23 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering

If anyones wants to read it they can, direct from the source, no need to c&p and repost it here continually...

Message 24 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering


 


he was paid to harrass gillard.


 


And I'm sure you have some proof to back that statement. I'll wait till you post it.



 


And are you going to "giggle" while you wait?


 

Message 25 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering

 



 


his website is delivered here most days by NW. i also was aware of him before he was paid to harrass gillard..



 


 


Ive seen them posted here daily LL, have never bothered to read them though

Message 26 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering


his website is delivered here most days by NW


 


Personnaly I've never noticed.


 


he was paid to harrass gillard.


 


And I'm sure you have some proof to back that statement. I'll wait till you post it.



 


you seriously think he does it for free ? nope. he has anonymous backers who aren't that anonymous. my statement has more credibility than his AWU allegations.


if he make's his living harrassing Gillard, he's being paid to harrass gillard isn't he ? what would you call it ?

Message 27 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering


And of course the luvvies are big supporters of "If I dont like it no one else should see it" way of reasoning. So I do understand where all the looney lefties are coming from. But personally I don't give a crap what they think.



 


thats not how i feel about it. the morons can look if they wan't .. as much as they want. just don't expect to be taken at all seriously though.

Message 28 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering

I found this thread .As Larry Pickering has been and is unfortunately featurng very strongly in our Political and social media I would like to add to the thread.I realise the article is from last year.Some of Larry Pickerings artwork lead me to look into this

 

.In the article below it states that on his blog he writes that Aboriginals are the most primitive, under-developed race on earth ... it is not until we understand the extent of their innate primitiveness that we can ever hope to help". He states that scientists are lying about climate change and he declares similar skullduggery afoot in doctors' denials of the health-giving properties of tobacco. 

 

I have heard people refer to him as an intelligent and educated man ...those claims along with the attitude of respect that some seem to feel he is worthy of is imo quite frightening...for those who feel that way about him and what he publishes.

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

News Ltd's Double Standards On Anti-Semitism

By Jeff Sparrow
 
The Australian is all too ready to lambast the Greens or pro-Palestine activists as anti-Semites. What about Larry Pickering, who's been on their payroll, asks Jeff Sparrow
 
"A fresh wave of racial hatred against the Jewish community, including calls for a Hitler clone and ethnic cleansing, has been sparked by the anti-Israel boycott campaign of the Max Brenner chocolate shop chain."

That was John Ferguson in The Australian on 22 August. To put it charitably, he's twanging a decidedly long bow, because this "wave of racial hatred" consists entirely of several bigoted remarks posted under a YouTube clip. Under normal circumstances YouTube comments are scarcely breaking news, particularly so in this case given the video itself wasn't itself racist and the Max Brenner protesters had no ability to moderate it either.

 

http://newmatilda.com/2012/08/29/news-ltds-double-standards-anti-semitism

 

 

 

last 3 paragraphs from above 

 

 

Peter Wertheim suggests that protesters needed to ask themselves why racists commented on their YouTube clips. But that's a question better directed to the conservative movement. There's no mystery about Pickering's politics. Why, then, are so many big names on the Right giving him oxygen, sending him traffic and otherwise helping him build his racist publication?

 

What does the Executive Council of Australian Jewry make of this? Is Peter Wertheim concerned that prominent pundits seem to have no problem palling around with a racist? If so, will he issue a statement to that effect?

 

The Australian, in particular, has devoted reams and reams of paper to denouncing the Greens for involvement with the BDS movement, even though no-one from the Greens ever talked about "vanity-driven, thieving Jews". Why, then, won't the Australian devote equal space to condemning the anti-Semite who has been on its payroll and whose work still features on its site?

 

Message 29 of 34
Latest reply

Re: Pickering


@catmad*2013 wrote:

On the subject of how many children he has to how many women is that any different to one woman having six different kids to three or four different men? 



Like the mother of the woman locked up in Indonesia?

 

Message 30 of 34
Latest reply