Scott Morrison

[freddie*rooster]

Is full of it, how can a Minister go on and on and on, for what about 3/4hr, repeating the same ole over and over again without answering the questions asked of him? All he done was repeat his "crystal clear" slogan when in fact nothing is crystal clear except his Government's failure to stop the boats, as per their election promise.

[silverfaun]

---

@poddster wrote:

Debra, Freaki, just so that everyone is clear on the differences, could either of you explain what the differences are in a the unlawful entry into a country and the unlawful entry into a home.

In neither scenario was there permission sought or granted

---

It's all political, they don't give a rats about these  "asylum refugees" all they care about is mouthing off to try to get Morrison sacked. To upset the successful program of ruining the criminal "business model" of people smuggling and illegal incursions.

They are using this unfortunate death for their own political ends. This is typical Left dogma & behaviour 101.

[polksaladallie]

---

@tall_bearded wrote:

My bad.  I misinterpreted therefore it’s to me to apologise

---

Thank you, and I thank you for your service.  However I do not agree with the decisions that are made by the suits who may have sent you there. 

[boris1gary]

[freakiness]

---

@silverfaun wrote:

---

@poddster wrote:

Debra, Freaki, just so that everyone is clear on the differences, could either of you explain what the differences are in a the unlawful entry into a country and the unlawful entry into a home.

In neither scenario was there permission sought or granted

---

It's all political, they don't give a rats about these  "asylum refugees" all they care about is mouthing off to try to get Morrison sacked. To upset the successful program of ruining the criminal "business model" of people smuggling and illegal incursions.

They are using this unfortunate death for their own political ends. This is typical Left dogma & behaviour 101.

---

Who are you to assume to declare what my motives are?

I don't recall saying Morrison should be sacked and I certainly don't expect anything I say here, on this forum, will cause him to be sacked.

[lakeland27]

who have they to replace him anyway.  another mindless drone won't fix it . besides, his cornered rat routine is enjoyable.

[donnashuggy]

I think they should replace him with this man:

[lakeland27]

  He isn't right wing enough. remember Reagans son said his father wouldn't recognise the republican party of today, and wouldn't gain endorsement as a candidate as they would consider him too moderate. Fraser is the same to the modern libs.

[donnashuggy]

they need a woman in the job!

[lakeland27]

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

they need a woman in the job!

---

  as long as she isn't a cash or a nash.  a gillard sounds good. but the best solution is to get them out of office and let Sarah hanson-young handle it .

[the_great_she_elephant]

---

@silverfaun wrote:

---

@tall_bearded wrote:

Old news.

Isn’t it a case she only witnessed the aftermath.  That is she didn’t actually see anything but simply repeating what she was told

I say again I will wait for the facts.  Not hearsay, innuendo, like the shoot to kill order

---

She has been exposed for spouting hearsay and innuendo and her bias has seen her removed from her position.

---

I assume you are speaking of Azita Bokan. Would you like to provide a link? I have scoured the internet and can find no reference to her having been' exposed for spouting hearsay and innuendo - only that  she was "dismissed on Sunday after trying to intervene in a scuffle between detainees and G4S staff."

And your commen lalso  begs the question, if "spouting hearsay and innuend"' is a sackable offence, then who else ought to be looking down the barrel?