The Filth that is Labor

[silverfaun]

The choking miasma of corruption that infests Labor is going to be exposed at last.

The criminal unions who are the real Labor party will see the day when decent Australians say "No more".

More companies and their workers are standing up to the CFMEU and others against the most abusive and horrific threats and damage to their companies and the workers career's.

The decent Australian companies who have been extorted fo decades are finally rebelling against the blackmail and extortion.

The day the unions are ousted from all political power, the tentacles of standover crims and corruption, bikie hard men and greedy thieves will be a great day for Australia.

No more will they see their hard earned money garnisheed straight into the union coffers to pay for the likes of Williamson and Thomson to use as their own personal money tap.

Williamson, the National President of the Labor Party for years and nobody thought to question the lavish lifestyle, the homes and cars? the ostentatious wealth he flaunted? No one?? anyone? no? why? because they were all complicit.

The courage of Kathy Jackson to finally blow the whistle against the horrifying threats of Labor and the unions is to be applauded, instead Labor and the unions speak of her as a filthy dirty rat to be exterminated.

Gillard and Rudd allowed Thomson to stand in Parliament for years, protecting him, paying his bills, supporting him even when it was obvious to all he was rotten and a disgrace.

They are a party of no conscience or morality, ethics or principle, no core values and tenets.   All the while Shorten is saying they brook no criminal behaviour by unions or party members all the while trying to protect the very unions who saw him gain the top job. The weasel words and utterances of convenience is transparent.

When will Labor find a good man or woman, when will Labor locate their moral compass and ethical fibre? What have they got to show for the massive loss they suffered, what are they offering the voters? just more of the same. The soft hollow leader and the empty vessels of the rest on show every day.

[azureline**]

seems odd doesn't it?

Did the OP swallow a dictionary or  a newspaper?

[polocross58]

Well, I believe Tony Abbott should NOT have stated publicly (if in fact he did) that he stands behind Liberal Senator Arthur Sinodinos

It REEKS of Gillard stating she stood behind Craig Thompson -- and we know how that ended

I feel Abbott made a big mistake and should instead have said (if he felt it wise to say anything at all) that he would rely on the enquiries to arrive at the correct conclusion in the fullness of time

It's mental to play Black vs White

Good vs Bad

This party (football team) vs the other

They are ALL painted with the same brush

The 'opposition' they play at is for the public, whom both parties regard as patsies and idiots

In private, it's all back-slapping, mutual invitations, jolly hockey-sticks and all snouts in the same trough, snuffling and rooting in self-interest and corruption while sharing vintage wines down there in the Parliamentary cafeteria at a dollar a pop

They ALL need holding to account

but they evade that by playing one side against the other

Wake up for goodness sakes.  They've been playing voters for fools since the First Fleet

[i-need-a-martini]

Williamson, the National President of the Labor Party for years and nobody thought to question the lavish lifestyle, the homes and cars? the ostentatious wealth he flaunted? No one?? anyone? no? why? because they were all complicit.

You mean like how no one thought to question how a Liberal politician on an annual salary of $140,000 per year could afford to lease an eastern suburbs house for $100,000 per year, send 2 of his 3 children to the best private schools in Sydney with annual fees plus costs of approximately $40,000 each child, plus brand new luxury cars leased each year and a glamourous lifestyle for his stay at home wife?

If your theory is correct then can I also assume that the entire Liberal Party is complicit in Arthurs scandalous way of life?

[boris1gary]

---

@azureline** wrote:

seems odd doesn't it?

Did the OP swallow a dictionary or  a newspaper?

---

bolt the dolts bog maybe.

[li.vish]

Hello, everyone. This discussion is getting a little heated. Could we please communicate with a more civil tone. Thanks!

[icyfroth]

---

@boris1gary wrote:

---

@azureline** wrote:

seems odd doesn't it?

Did the OP swallow a dictionary or  a newspaper?

---

bolt the dolts bog maybe.

---

When all else fails, quote excrement...

[izabsmiling]

I won't be quoting the opening post .

[boris1gary]

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@boris1gary wrote:

---

@azureline** wrote:

seems odd doesn't it?

Did the OP swallow a dictionary or  a newspaper?

---

bolt the dolts bog maybe.

---

When all else fails, quote excrement...

---

oh dear, a typo - obviously I meant blog, although if one was to quote from the dolts blog it would be excrement.

[aftanas]

---

@li.vish wrote:

Hello, everyone. This discussion is getting a little heated. Could we please communicate with a more civil tone. Thanks!

---

I doubt it.

[silverfaun]

not when you get  the likes of replies like bolt the bog dolt, it won't.

Some just cannot construct a sentence without the name calling and offensive changing of names, they think it's clever.