Thread without a name

In the name of community spirit, I dared not title this thread "the year of the bush"

 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/19/year-of-the-bush-female-body-hair-cameron-diaz-...

 

On John Ruskin's wedding night, legend has it, the critic fainted on finding that – unlike the Elysian statues of his fantasies – women had body hair. Monday is the 114th anniversary of Ruskin's death. Who would've predicted that instead of laughing at Victorian prudery, many men still expect their sexual encounters to entail pudenda, pins and pits as marble smooth as those of young Ruskin's imagination?

But there's a change in the wind, a turn in the worm: oh yes, something's in the hair. Though I'm no astrologer, I think 2014 might just be the year of the bush.

 

Message 1 of 21
Latest reply
20 REPLIES 20

Thread without a name

This is not intended to cause mischief. The story surprised me with it's implication that the majority take it off these days. I don't think they were talking only women either.  😄

Message 2 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name

mmm i will stay silent on should it stay or should it go, it's a very hairy question.

Woman LOL

Message 3 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name


@boris1gary wrote:

mmm i will stay silent on should it stay or should it go, it's a very hairy question.

Woman LOL



I was surprised at the writer for being surprised that 50% of british women don't and equally surprised at they can't expect him to if they don't.    😄

 

It's an interesting point about corporate invention of need and selling it to us.

 

 

Message 4 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name

Think I will just watch this thread and say nothing.Smiley Happy

Message 5 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name


@purple_haize wrote:

Think I will just watch this thread and say nothing.Smiley Happy


This is when we need multiple choice.

Surpirsed or not surprised  😄

Message 6 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name

John Ruskin was considered a Great Man and as such his poor wife copped the flak when he claimed not to make her his True Wife because of distaste of her less than hairless body.  Can't help wondering if the Great Man lacked a certain necessary hormone or three?

 

As for to bush or not to bush -     to each his/her own I think      Woman LOL

Message 7 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name

me too, except to add definitely a DIYer.

Woman LOLWoman LOL

Message 8 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name

That's a relief .... I thought this thread was going to be about Dubya

 

Anyways, now that I see the real purpose, I see a big future for merkin makers Smiley Very Happy

prostate cancer ribbon Pictures, Images and Photos
Message 9 of 21
Latest reply

Thread without a name

It is about Dubya. He used to often say "Mah fellow merkins"😊
Message 10 of 21
Latest reply