What do you think of this dress?

[i-need-a-martini]

You've got to wonder what goes through the minds of some women when they choose their outfits...

What was Erica Packer thinking when she wore this outfit to a recent Vogue celebration? Perhaps it looks worse because she is standing next to the always elegant Sarah Murdoch but, yikes, she is showing us a good example of how money can't buy style.

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/alist-pals-like-sarah-murdoch-gretel-packer-and-terry...

[freddie*rooster]

Horsey looking is a long sharp face with big teeth.

[i-need-a-martini]

---

@twinkles**stars wrote:

How about posting the perfect photo of yourself 😞 She's lovely, her smile is nice, she raises a lot for charity, she's a mother of 3, has been from all acounts a loving wife to James during their marriage.

Actually I am quite disappointed with the witch hunt that is going on here.

---

What witch hunt? 

Aren't we allowed to comment on what a public figure wears or have opinions on how she presents herself?? No one has said anything about her parenting skills or if she was a decent wife to Packer.

Her looks appeal to you but not to others. So be it.

The dress appeals to some. But not to others. So be it.

[**meep**]

---

@freddie*rooster wrote:

Horsey looking is a long sharp face with big teeth.

---

on that last photo with the arrow, she remind me of Dannii Minogue.

[freddie*rooster]

Meep, sometimes Danni looks average, other times she looks gorgeous. I like her hair short. Megan Gale is another, who at times looks ordinary, and at other times beautiful. I guess we all like to have an opinion and comment when these celebs are put on a pedestal.

[**meep**]

Aren't we allowed to comment on what a public figure wears or have opinions on how she presents herself??

wellllllll..........not if she is a female politician.......so.........

[i-need-a-martini]

---

@**meep** wrote:

Aren't we allowed to comment on what a public figure wears or have opinions on how she presents herself??

wellllllll..........not if she is a female politician.......so.........

---

The comments about Gillard were about her physical body and other comments were sexually offensive in nature. That is a little different to this.

[**meep**]

---

@i-need-a-martini wrote:

---

@**meep** wrote:

Aren't we allowed to comment on what a public figure wears or have opinions on how she presents herself??

wellllllll..........not if she is a female politician.......so.........

---

The comments about Gillard were about her physical body and other comments were sexually offensive in nature. That is a little different to this.

---

and some of the comments here are not? 

OK....

[freakiness]

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@i-need-a-martini wrote:

---

@**meep** wrote:

Aren't we allowed to comment on what a public figure wears or have opinions on how she presents herself??

wellllllll..........not if she is a female politician.......so.........

---

The comments about Gillard were about her physical body and other comments were sexually offensive in nature. That is a little different to this.

---

and some of the comments here are not? 

OK....

---

The major difference is in the jobs.  The person being commented on in this discussion makes a living out of posing and fashion so it is relevant to discuss how she looks an what she is wearing. Politicians are not in the job to be judged on their sense of fashion or attacked based on gender over what they do in the job.

[Anonymous]

are we still talking about this. lol

i thought she looked like danni too- I didnt like her hair......think it spoilt the whole outfit, it should have been out, and wavy.

[not_an_eloi]

errr ..  anybody open the link in post 46

the dress that the erika sheila wore

model appears to be skinnier size than the ex-packer,

could be the reason why she's bulgin' out under the pits 

and in the hip, in one of the other fotos.