The fb page is public, anyone can read it.

---

@monman12 wrote:

IS: "even to the extent of being involved with the jailing of inncocent Australians"

What is it with the CS history "buffs", especially as this topic was debated to death  here a long while ago?

 

Conclusions of the Crime and Misconduct Commission Jan 2004

"The Commission is of the opinion that no misconduct or other impropriety has been
shown to have been associated with the conduct of the litigation concerning Ms
Hanson and Mr Ettridge, or with the police investigations leading to the prosecution.
The Commission also found no evidence of political pressure or other improper
influence or impropriety.
The Commission found nothing to show a failure to accord due process, in
accordance with the rule of law, to Ms Hanson and Mr Ettridge. In particular, the
involvement of Tony Abbott in events leading up to the institution of proceedings to
deregister the party did not produce or constitute a failure of due process."

 

"Sadly" the attempt to regurgitate history have almost been overlooked by the media. However I discovered this:

 

"Chances are Ettridge will obtain an anti-Abbott lawyer to help him pursue his exotic and quixotic legal adventure, that was clearly the reason for making his claims public"

 

---

I have already replied to this .I forgot to add the most important thing.

This man is in the running to be our PM.Regardless of your own  ruling of lack importance of this current legal matter concerning someone who may/may not be voted in to be our next PM.

WE the voters should be informed about this current legal matter which involves him .This isn't history!

it is of no importance that you feel it is of  no importance

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

One commentator this morning suggested that abbott already had that rude comment in his repertoire, because it is well known that Rudd is very verbose and uses "big" words (words that Lib supporters don't understand), and saw the opportunity to use it.

 

---

such as?

 

 

---

PRIME Minister Kevin Rudd's penchant for big words not only confuses foreigners, but everyday Australians, Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull says.

 

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/rudd-bamboozles-germans-with-programmatic-specificity/story-e6frg12c...

 

MUCH has been written about Kevin Rudd's verbal acrobatics. Most has centred on the verbose language the Prime Minister uses.

 

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/rudd-fails-to-conquer-verbal-gymnastics/story-e6frfifo-1111...

---

so it is not only Lib supporters that don't understand the words, it also includes everyday Australians and Germans. Ok. 

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

"Didn't think my personal page/opinion of my day would get so much attention," she wrote.

 

 

 

 

 

---

is it someone well known?  i had never had of Lily Fontana until today.  Is her FB page popular?

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

 

so it is not only Lib supporters that don't understand the words, it also includes everyday Australians and Germans. Ok. 

 

 

---

Where did I say the word "only"?

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

 

so it is not only Lib supporters that don't understand the words, it also includes everyday Australians and Germans. Ok. 

 

 

---

Where did I say the word "only"?

---

where did i say it was you who said it?

i thought you were quoting some commentator who made specific reference to Lib supporters (only)

---

---

 My daughter had only moments before said "does he ever shut up or know when to?"

---

Apparently, people timed with stop watches how long did each of them speak and Rudd spoke only 1and half minutes longer than TA.

she uses it for her profile, public face, for getting more work.

well, that's a shame.  i have tried to find her FB page but it says its been removed. 

I honestly believe if Abbott said he was going to double your tax and put the minimum wage down you would still vote for his party