so, they are relatively small schools then compared to the ones that were closed down here. Even the High School I planned on sending my kids to disappeared , and this is a very built up area.

none of the money that resulted from the sale of the school sites was ever put back into education, i don't know where it went, but the state was in surplus ::

---

@debra9275 wrote:

so, they are relatively small schools then compared to the ones that were closed down here. Even the High School I planned on sending my kids to disappeared , and this is a very built up area.

 

none of the money that resulted from the sale of the school sites was ever put back into education, i don't know where it went, but the state was in surplus ::

---

They were drastic weren't they ...we were warned 

Kevin Rudd, who has campaigned strongly in Queensland against Newman government cuts, said Mr Abbott now wanted to emulate the former Victorian premier.

“He regards Jeff Kennett as representing a `golden age', and he therefore embraces that as his model for the future,” the Prime Minister said today.

“In the period that Mr Kennett was premier of Victoria, 300 public schools were closed, 9000 teachers and school staff were sacked, 3500 nurses were sacked, 17 hospitals were closed, 800 police officers were sacked, 45,000 public servants were sacked, unemployment peaked at 12.3 per cent, and state taxes ended up being the second highest in Australia.

“If that is a golden age that Mr Abbott embraces for Australia's future, I think the people of Australia will legitimately ask, `Where are your $70 billion worth of cuts going to fall?'.”

Campaigning in Victoria this morning, Mr Abbott praised Mr Kennett for getting the state moving again.

“Jeff was one of the great premiers of our country,” he said, alongside current Victorian Premier Denis Naphthine.

- See more at: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/election-2013/kevin-rudd-revives-memories-of-jeff-k...

I'm afraid to look at the plans for Victoria.Over the past few years it's been enough of a battle to get funding for the required number of teachers.

I understand peoples frustrations... 

BUT ... I also understand the governments. People expect so much from a government and it's service yet they also demand lower taxes. The government is a business for the people. It must manage for everyone and not just a minority. 

Do I think that my taxes should go to support a school that is not running efficiently and wasting cash when it should be looking for best managment and services???

going by the Courier Mail article in the link ..at these one of those schools (based at a Uni?) didn't seem to meet the criteria and had an understanding that they would be given a years notice ?

Almost 14000 are planning a half day strike in WA tomorrow against cuts to the education system that would see a loss of 500 jobs to the public education system in WA

The bit that I think makes it look bad in the article is how the announcement was allegedly held back until after the election so that it didn't have a negative impact on the election. That just seems a bit sneaky to me.

Fair enough, if the schools are not running efficiently and there are other alternatives, then they need to close, but holding back the announcement does seem a bit sneaky,

Deb, there was a fair bit of money injected into schools in recent years.

There was the $3000 for school halls or libraries.

There was another $200,000 for science labs (conditions applied)

There was the money rolled out for the ICT upgrades, either by the provision of the free devices or upgrading existing ICT infrastructure in the schools.

There were some other smaller grants that schools could apply for as well, but sadly a fair few schools either didn't even apply or submitted poorly constructed applications.

---

@catmad*2013 wrote:

I understand peoples frustrations... 

 

BUT ... I also understand the governments. People expect so much from a government and it's service yet they also demand lower taxes. The government is a business for the people. It must manage for everyone and not just a minority. 

 

Do I think that my taxes should go to support a school that is not running efficiently and wasting cash when it should be looking for best managment and services???

 

 

---

Was this maybe the thinking behind the cuts to the TAFE system that was being talked about on here recently?

yes, it sure was ... and I am not going to use your ID to reply to .. I find it offensive