---

@*ibis wrote:

true but i noticed no rise in the sea levfel

 

i moderate it  all day every day 

 

confusing

---

Kiribati: A Nation Going Under

Villagers on Abaiang, one of the Kiribati Islands, had to relocate the entire village of Tebunginako because of rising seas and erosion.

http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/kiribati-a-nation-going-under/590/

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

---

@*ibis wrote:

true but i noticed no rise in the sea levfel

 

i moderate it  all day every day 

 

confusing

---

Kiribati: A Nation Going Under

 

Villagers on Abaiang, one of the Kiribati Islands, had to relocate the entire village of Tebunginako because of rising seas and erosion.

http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/kiribati-a-nation-going-under/590/

 

---

Abaiang is and was uninhabited by permanent residents. The "village" consisted of people servicing tourists who went there to dive and fish etc. They only went there when tourists were expected.

1.5 m above sea level.

---

@crikey*mate wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

---

@*ibis wrote:

true but i noticed no rise in the sea levfel

 

i moderate it  all day every day 

 

confusing

---

Kiribati: A Nation Going Under

 

Villagers on Abaiang, one of the Kiribati Islands, had to relocate the entire village of Tebunginako because of rising seas and erosion.

http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/kiribati-a-nation-going-under/590/

 

---

Abaiang is and was uninhabited by permanent residents. The "village" consisted of people servicing tourists who went there to dive and fish etc. They only went there when tourists were expected.

 

1.5 m above sea level.

 

 

---

... Are they sinking?.....or are they growing?.....

Satellite images  of Kiribati over the last 28 years.

http://earthengine.google.org/#intro/v=1.8668577,-157.35992020000003,9.510624971357084

Climate scientists have expressed surprise at findings that many low-lying Pacific islands are growing, not sinking. 

hmm . hard to convince a majority with that debunked gibber. you should get some decent peer reviewed material, the back of weetbix packets falls a little short.

  Satellite images are "debunked"?.....giggle....  

what time of day were the images taken . it moves far too quickly to see tidal variances , so it is irrelevant.

slight of hand is a common flat earth method of 'proving' something that proves nothing.

   28 years of images go too fast for you.......lol....  

    Try the pause button.....that's what it's for.........