Poor LL.......no data of your own?.....so sad........

Discuss the topic?
SRBA that is somewhat  hypercritical considering you have never debated from a sound scientific  basis, ever.

Your graphs,  from Monkton, are for a carefully selected (relatively short)  period,  and in order to justify your/his comments, originate when a very warm El Niño event was about to commence, so obviously  following individual years will be colder.

I find it a scientific  affront that for the carefully selected 16 year period  trend (fudge)  this is then extrapolated into a  trend for a century, which is absolute nonsense.
 
However if you bothered to use a meaningful average  period (10 years) you would find this:

NASA
"January 2000 to December 2009 was the warmest decade on record."
BOM
Last month was easily Australia's warmest September on record 2013.
• 2000 to 2009 was Australia’s warmest decade on record

nɥºɾ

Trend for a century?.........Where was that stated?

The second graph was over a  30 year period.....what would you like to assume about that one Mm?

The last 10 years of temperatures were brought up early in this thread Mm....like a typical Alarmist, you have managed to make alot of

assumptions.....   

Not very scientific of you Mm. 

Now prove that any change in temperature is not natural variation........

Good luck!..........

SRBA: "Trend for a century?.........Where was that stated?"

Try looking again at your carefully timeline selected  Monckton graph with added nonsense SRBA,  hint (-0.01 C°/century) with the temperature sign back to front C°, should be °C, as well as expressing a nonsense extrapolation.

SRBA: "The second graph was over a  30 year period.....what would you like to assume about that one Mm?"

That you made a mistake SRBA, because that 30 year period from 1979 mirrors my graphs  below, and the numerous other  NASA ones, in that there was  around a positive increase of 0.5°C during the time featured period (30 years)

SRBA: "The last 10 years of temperatures were brought up early in this thread Mm....like a typical Alarmist."  Not so DLA   NASA’s areas of research are decadal surveys with which which I am comfortable, as are our BOM here (grey area decadal averages)

Note the dt/dt of your, and my presented graphs covering 30 years SRBA, all around +0.5 °C, or if you prefer +0.5 C°

 nɥºɾ

Good, so your're with the program......"mirrors my graphs  below, and the numerous other  NASA ones, in that there was  around a

positive increase of 0.5°C during the time featured period (30 years)"....

.....who do think created the graph I posted MM...*rolls eyes*

Now, prove that the temperature change, is not  just a natural variation......

As if mere ants could alter this great work.  i am reminded of the evil Mr darwin , and his outrageous claims.