---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@joz*garage wrote:

---

@twinkles**stars wrote:

There is a huge difference between driving past a child waving an obvious toy gun to one that looks real. How hard is that to understand? For most of us not hard at all.

---

i do understand that there are drama queens in the community

---

do you think declaring some toy guns as prohibited weapons is an overreaction as well?   what do you think the reasoning behind the changes to the Vic Firearm Act was?

 

 

 

---

nah not really, depends on the complaints, im wondering if these prohibited toy weapons are still available in victorian stores?

and what age groups abused these type of toy guns to intimidate the public with?

were they 10 year old school kids?

---

@joz*garage wrote:

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@joz*garage wrote:

---

@twinkles**stars wrote:

There is a huge difference between driving past a child waving an obvious toy gun to one that looks real. How hard is that to understand? For most of us not hard at all.

---

i do understand that there are drama queens in the community

---

do you think declaring some toy guns as prohibited weapons is an overreaction as well?   what do you think the reasoning behind the changes to the Vic Firearm Act was?

 

 

 

---

nah not really, depends on the complaints, im wondering if these prohibited toy weapons are still available in victorian stores?

 

and what age groups abused these type of toy guns to intimidate the public with?

 

were they 10 year old school kids?

 

 

---

I spent all day discussing it here yesterday lol

you need an approval to make, possess, carry, use, sell or import them..........

Someones conscience isn't clean.......*rolls eyes*

Questioning the decision means there is a struggle with right and wrong........

I spent all day discussing it here yesterday lol

yes i do remember you going on and on and on and on about something

---

@joz*garage wrote:

I spent all day discussing it here yesterday lol

 

 

yes i do remember you going on and on and on and on about something

---

it was actually what you asked me about in your previous post but I didn't mind posting the info again. 

and knowing all what you found out about toy gun laws. eve, you would still call the police if you saw a school kid of just 10 years of age playing with a toy gun?

ok

---

@joz*garage wrote:

 

and knowing all what you found out about toy gun laws. eve, you would still call the police if you saw a school kid of just 10 years of age playing with a toy gun?

ok

---

yes, even more so!  a child should not be in a possession of a toy that looks like a real gun

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@joz*garage wrote:

 

and knowing all what you found out about toy gun laws. eve, you would still call the police if you saw a school kid of just 10 years of age playing with a toy gun?

ok

---

yes, even more so!  a child should not be in a possession of a toy that looks like a real gun

---

do you and the OP live in vic?

must abide and assist the police with every law huh?

---

@joz*garage wrote:

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@joz*garage wrote:

 

and knowing all what you found out about toy gun laws. eve, you would still call the police if you saw a school kid of just 10 years of age playing with a toy gun?

ok

---

yes, even more so!  a child should not be in a possession of a toy that looks like a real gun

---

do you and the OP live in vic?

 

must abide and assist the police with every law huh?

---

I thought the OP did.  I don't.  I was putting myself in her situation

i take your last question was a rhetorical one....

i take your last question was a rhetorical one....

your question could also be seen as an rhetorial one, i could go on, on what i really think of why you contributed to this thread

but it would only get edited.