- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 07:35 PM
I beg to differ they are as communist as can be.
I would also hazard a guess that there are others posters on this forum who have lived under a communist regime who now no longer do. Why would that be do you think ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-02-2014 07:46 PM - edited 10-02-2014 07:48 PM
Trying to link our unions to those communist regimes mentioned is stretching delusions too far.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 07:51 PM
considering that stretching delusions is a Labor thing, I wouldn't have thought so.
Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 07:52 PM
Where did you get that notion?
By the way, so you recognise those countries as communist, Boris dosen't, perhaps you can inform Boris. 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 07:59 PM
@crikey*mate wrote:considering that stretching delusions is a Labor thing, I wouldn't have thought so.
Wow, it's only a few days since you said you knew very little about them
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 08:26 PM
Some people learn faster than others 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 08:51 PM
it is not that i don't "recognise" the countries mentioned by yourself as communist - it is a fact - if you knew the difference between a socialist society and a communist one - you would not have asked the question. Just to make it a little easier for you...below is a quote from Karl Marx, point 2 is referring to a socialist state, 3 is referring to a communist society which whatever your opinion may be, the reality is that there has not been a modern communist society.
And now as to myself, no credit is due to me for discovering the existence of classes in modern society or the struggle between them. Long before me bourgeois historians had described the historical development of this class struggle and bourgeois economists, the economic anatomy of classes. What I did that was new was to prove:
(1) that the existence of classes is only bound up with the particular, historical phases in the development of production,
(2) that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat,
(3) that this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless society.
does this help at all
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 08:54 PM
@poddster wrote:Some people learn faster than others 🙂
This may be true, but obviously some don't learn at all............
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 08:55 PM
@freakiness wrote:
@crikey*mate wrote:considering that stretching delusions is a Labor thing, I wouldn't have thought so.
Wow, it's only a few days since you said you knew very little about them
what delusions have they been stretching crikey?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 10-02-2014 10:09 PM
(2) that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat,
(3) that this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless society
Do you think that the above are admirable traits?
Are you in favour of no distinction between people, that they all become homogenise into a uniform goo with no individuality?
Perhaps you see yourself as an overseer of the homogenised mass of uniformity?
But how could that happen? All would be equal, without distinction.