I beg to differ they are as communist as can be.

 

I would also hazard a guess that there are others posters on this forum who have lived under a communist regime who now no longer do. Why would that be do you think ?

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

Trying to link our unions to those communist regimes mentioned is stretching delusions too far.

 

 

 

considering that stretching delusions is a Labor thing, I wouldn't have thought so.


Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.

Where did you get that notion?

 

 By the way, so you recognise those countries as communist, Boris dosen't, perhaps you can inform Boris. 🙂

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.


@crikey*mate wrote:

considering that stretching delusions is a Labor thing, I wouldn't have thought so.


Wow, it's only a few days since you said you knew very little about them 

Some people learn faster than others 🙂

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

it is not that i don't "recognise" the countries mentioned by yourself as communist - it is a fact - if you knew the difference between a socialist society and a communist one - you would not have asked the question. Just to make it a little easier for you...below is a quote from Karl Marx, point 2 is referring to a socialist state, 3 is referring to a communist society which whatever your opinion may be, the reality is that there has not been a modern communist society.

 

And now as to myself, no credit is due to me for discovering the existence of classes in modern society or the struggle between them. Long before me bourgeois historians had described the historical development of this class struggle and bourgeois economists, the economic anatomy of classes. What I did that was new was to prove:
(1) that the existence of classes is only bound up with the particular, historical phases in the development of production,
(2) that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat,
(3) that this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless society.

 

does this help at all


@poddster wrote:

Some people learn faster than others 🙂


This may be true, but obviously some don't learn at all............

 


@freakiness wrote:

@crikey*mate wrote:

considering that stretching delusions is a Labor thing, I wouldn't have thought so.


Wow, it's only a few days since you said you knew very little about them 


what delusions have they been stretching crikey?

(2) that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat,
(3) that this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless society

 

Do you think that the above are admirable traits?

 

Are you in favour of no distinction between people, that they all become homogenise into a uniform goo with no individuality?

 

Perhaps you see yourself as an overseer of the homogenised mass of uniformity?

 

But how could that happen? All would be equal, without distinction.

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.