South

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Which reminds me, I think I said someones views were naive once, is that against the rules?

---

could be donna, if someone felt it was an "interpersonal dispute", so better not to do any of that. It's so subjective that it border's on the ridiculous. The "interpersonal dispute" thing reminds me of an ex-friend, if you said "I don't like uneven hems" and she had once purchased such a garment - she would take that as a personal attack, 2 day's later you would get an sms banging on about how hurt she was.    Best be careful, and don't mention any id that may no longer be registered - although how on earth are you supposed to know that.

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Which reminds me, I think I said someones views were naive once, is that against the rules?

---

I think it all basically comes down to the Golden Rule.  Treat others they way you would like to be treated.  Can't go wrong.

So being naive doesn't actually count?

For example, sometimes people involve themselves in things/subjects way over their head and then admit they don't know anything about the subject, is it fair to call them naive?

Would uneducated be a better term?

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

So being naive doesn't actually count?

 

For example, sometimes people involve themselves in things/subjects way over their head and then admit they don't know anything about the subject, is it fair to call them naive?

 

Would uneducated be a better term?

---

don't call them anything at all - and i don't mean call them - nothing.

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Which reminds me, I think I said someones views were naive once, is that against the rules?

---

 

I think it all basically comes down to the Golden Rule.  Treat others they way you would like to be treated.  Can't go wrong.

 

 

---

meep, the Golden Rule is sooooooooooo subjective

yeah doona you should know you'd get modded for calling another poster that, i have been modded for it a few times

lol at grizz

Catching any donna?