I listened to it twice .imo it sounds as though he is saying they are incredibly oppressive men and women.


@lakeland27 wrote:

no , she didn't actually say that.. there was more . 


________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

yes there was and the very important aspect that her Government didn't 'lead' due to election results 


@izabsmiling wrote:

@lakeland27 wrote:

no , she didn't actually say that.. there was more . 


________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

yes there was and the very important aspect that her Government didn't 'lead' due to election results 


that is only relevant if you are under the false impression that the libs and nationals are truly 2 autonomous parties. its apparent that they aren't ,  the libs and nats are in fact shills for each other.

it's relevant if people keep quoting the words  "there will be no carbon tax under the Government I lead"  as a broken promise ?


@lakeland27 wrote:

@izabsmiling wrote:

@lakeland27 wrote:

no , she didn't actually say that.. there was more . 


________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

yes there was and the very important aspect that her Government didn't 'lead' due to election results 


that is only relevant if you are under the false impression that the libs and nationals are truly 2 autonomous parties. its apparent that they aren't ,  the libs and nats are in fact shills for each other.


Woman LOL  have a read of this, its old but......

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/blogs/godless-gross/the-agrarian-believers-20100903-14toq.htm...