@underbat wrote:

“Hello, everyone. This thread is getting a little interpersonal.

Please discuss differences of political persuasion without being interpersonal and insulting.

 

Thanks.

 


Thanks Woman Very Happy

Ugh
.

ditto Karen ...oh and .... thanks

so maybe only the likes of bolt the dolt are allowed to say whatever they wish, barracked by the defenders of "free speech", others are outside what is considered normal and decent. I think i'm finally beginning to understand.Woman Happy

our promised 'stronger' Government needs support Boris ..

The  little inconsequent can stand up in cowards castle and slim and slur everybody but runs a mile if he's invited to speak outside. Like I said: gormless. :robotlol:

 

Gormless has many meanings - none of them very complimentary  -  but it does not mean and never has meant cowardly..

 

Inconsequent is an adjective, not a noun. Someone may be correctly described as 'a person of no consequence', but not as' an inconsequent.'


@silverfaun wrote:

As much as I'd like to reply to all responses I'm sure you can understand that to do so will prob result in a slap, so keep replying I'm enjoying all your responses. Man Very Happy


 

 

I'm glad that you are enjoying all of the responses... though I  hope that posters will post regardless of your own personal enjoyment (or not ) of their posts.Woman Happy

 

Interesting.


@am*3 wrote:
Interesting.

what is ?..the vitriolic speech  ?

It's so incredibly bizarre  that I have no idea what to post Woman LOL