---

@izabsmiling wrote:

---

@boris1gary wrote:

---

@silverfaun wrote:

C&P  lectures?  we don't need a lecture on hate speech, this being the topic we are already discussing here.

---

of course not but the op did call Ludlums speech, "hate speech", which it clearly isn't. 

---

  kind of slanderous ? and shows little awareness of what hate speech is .

---

yes, something isn't  "hate speech" simply because a person hates it. just trying to add to the "intelligent debate".

after re-reading the defintion added ...it could be the declaration of such which fits the definition perhaps.

you use the word gormless silverfaun , I don't see or hear that word often these days .

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

after re-reading the defintion added ...it could be the declaration of such which fits the definition perhaps.

 

you use the word gormless silverfaun , I don't see or hear that word often these days .

---

Huh?

I take it you haven't watched the speech then?

There was no cry or shrillness. 

---

@silverfaun wrote:

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

after re-reading the defintion added ...it could be the declaration of such which fits the definition perhaps.

 

you use the word gormless silverfaun , I don't see or hear that word often these days .

---

Huh?

---

not specific to this thread 

ebays policy on Hate speech might explain better than I can atm.

---

@silverfaun wrote:

Priceless?? more like to gormless, too gormless to front up to a mainstraeam journalist and not a patsy of the left.

---

Would you turn up after being called vile?

The  little inconsequent can stand up in cowards castle and slim and slur everybody but runs a mile if he's invited to speak outside. Like I said: gormless.

Roll on election and lets get rid of him.