Silverfaun, I take great care now to make sure I write your full id and spell it correct ...not as your avitar suggests.I have learnt that if i do otherwise it will be corrected and quickly .I'm sorry that upsets you  as you expressed when I get it wrong ..please feel free to refer to me as Iza if you wish ...I don't see doing that (shortening my id or even getting that wrong like say isa as unfriendly) as a problem for mod attention.If I got such an error edited and made a fuss ..that imo would be unfriendly and would make others cautious .

---

@silverfaun wrote:

Luddite Ludlum, the termination the Greens had to have, opening many people's eyes as to just how poisonous the Green/Labor pact was, making sure no more Greens will be spawned.

 

The hate is appalling and anybody who aligns themselves with this type of thing is to be condemned in the wider community.

---

groups of Australians should be condemned in the community ? In what way ?

what would that suggestion and act be a display of  ?

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

Silverfaun, I take great care now to make sure I write your full id and spell it correct ...not as your avitar suggests.I have learnt that if i do otherwise it will be corrected and quickly .I'm sorry that upsets you  as you expressed when I get it wrong ..please feel free to refer to me as Iza if you wish ...I don't see doing that (shortening my id or even getting that wrong like say isa as unfriendly) as a problem for mod attention.If I got such an error edited and made a fuss ..that imo would be unfriendly and would make others cautious .

---

This new restriction is not anything I reported but has seen many left  posters getting people either edited or s....  if they have shortened their name.

I could name them  but that  would not result in a good outcome for me.

This has been happening lately because some want to distort an id for insult. I made a typo on an ID and even though I pointed out it was a typo I was ......

Now whether this is a new way of getting posters banned or something the powers that be have been instructed to do then we will never know.

For the many years I have been on here I have never been pulled up by another poster for shortening their ID.

So I would not refer to you with the dimunitive you so kindly offered,   others could take it as an excuse and let's face it some don't need much of an excuse.

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

---

@silverfaun wrote:

Luddite Ludlum, the termination the Greens had to have, opening many people's eyes as to just how poisonous the Green/Labor pact was, making sure no more Greens will be spawned.

 

The hate is appalling and anybody who aligns themselves with this type of thing is to be condemned in the wider community.

---

 

 

 

groups of Australians should be condemned in the community ? In what way ?

what would that suggestion and act be a display of  ?

---

Twisting my words??

What I referred to is the hate blogs and sites out there. If you agree with what they are saying and printing then they should be called out for the hate they support.

one of the great things about our Country is that we have freedom to vote as we wish without people with guns (fear of political persecution) standing over us.Our Laws uphold that right ... I for one value that and would HATE for that right to be lost .

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

one of the great things about our Country is that we have freedom to vote as we wish without people with guns (fear of political persecution) standing over us.Our Laws uphold that right ... I for one value that and would HATE for that right to be lost .

 

 

---

All very good qualities but that is not what was being discussed.

The  studied cry of Ludlum of  "I want my country back" was an insult to all the people who voted him out and voted the the party of their choice in.

His mindset is  that we all made a mistake by voting the way we did.

International law[edit]

As part of the Nuremberg Principles, crimes against humanity are part of international law. Principle VI of the Nuremberg Principles states that

The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:...

(c)Crimes against humanity:

Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.

Telford Taylor, who was Counsel for the Prosecution at the Nuremberg Trials wrote "[at] the Nuremberg war crimes trials, the tribunals rebuffed several efforts by the prosecution to bring such 'domestic' atrocities within the scope of international law as 'crimes against humanity'".[2] Several subsequent international treaties incorporate this principle, but some have dropped the restriction "in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime" that is in Nuremberg Principles.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which is binding on 111 states, defines crimes against humanity in Article 7.1. The article criminalises certain acts "committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack". These include:

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender[3]...or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph [e.g. murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, apartheid, and other inhumane acts] or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution

 

 

 

It's relevant if and where condemnation  of a group based on Political opinion (that which is within the bounds of the law) is advocated.See ^^^^ 

---

@lurker17260 wrote:
His mindset is that we all made a mistake by voting the way we did.


And, of course, he is perfectly entitled to think and say just that, whether you or I agree with him or not.

---

it is the same as what is written in the OP imo.that his opinion is 

not indicitive of the wider Australian people 

that is merely a personal opinion ...nothing more