Based on what though?

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.

---

@freakiness wrote:

Based on what though?

 

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.

---

 precisely. ludlam supports things the others wont touch because he isn't 'owned'

its a clear demonstration of the persuasive power of media , he stands up for those issues but he's bagged because andrew says so .

Maybe his dump speech was the damp dishrag or limp squid? there was next to nobody in  the house to listen to it except his cohort filming it.  All done for the youtube effect..lol

This is the type of stunt Greens are well known for, all hyperbole but no fact or substance, the quickie publicity stunt.

not unlike turnbulls speech where he explained his wickedness at launching a new newspaper that wasn't a right wing rag. i think he's tired of the backroom corys who run the agenda. what happened to allow the tea party to take control of the party anyway ?

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

not unlike turnbulls speech where he explained his wickedness at launching a new newspaper that wasn't a right wing rag. i think he's tired of the backroom corys who run the agenda. what happened to allow the tea party to take control of the party anyway ?

---

or the 20 minute one Turnbull gave to an empty house about his hatchet job on the NBN and posted on youtube.  Or was that covered in the same speech?

---

@freakiness wrote:

Based on what though?

 

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.

---

I sure woulnd't be basing my hopes and aspirations on the betterment for Australia on the likes of what I've seen in the past of the Rudd/Gillar/Rudd administration, thanks freaki.

It will be a long time between drinks if I ever place my confidence in that party again, thanks. I think you'll find that's precisely the reason the LNP under Mr Abbott was voted in by the Aus public.

---

@freakiness wrote:

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

not unlike turnbulls speech where he explained his wickedness at launching a new newspaper that wasn't a right wing rag. i think he's tired of the backroom corys who run the agenda. what happened to allow the tea party to take control of the party anyway ?

---

or the 20 minute one Turnbull gave to an empty house about his hatchet job on the NBN and posted on youtube.  Or was that covered in the same speech?

---

 he had to sneak in late and explain his launch of the new saturday paper, especially as he described murdoch in a most unflattering light. he was in damage control mode again.

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@freakiness wrote:

Based on what though?

 

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.

---

I sure woulnd't be basing my hopes and aspirations on the betterment for Australia on the likes of what I've seen in the past of the Rudd/Gillar/Rudd administration, thanks freaki.

 

It will be a long time between drinks if I ever place my confidence in that party again, thanks. I think you'll find that's precisely the reason the LNP under Mr Abbott was voted in by the Aus public.

---

So you'd rather we sign up to the TPP and allow any and all CSG developments whether people affected like it or not?

What has Rudd or gillard got to do with the speech Ludlam gave?