Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

izabsmiling · ‎10-03-2014

I'm thinking that it is desired that the Unhinged Vitriolic Speech ...Should go back to this being a bashing of Labor and Green and any supporters they may have and of course in general non believers in the Coalition ?

icyfroth · ‎10-03-2014

Scott Ludlam started it...

izabsmiling · ‎10-03-2014

From the OP:This disgusting swan song from a Green was lauded on here as a milestone and a rival to Gillards misplaced misogyny rant.

The people who support this type of hate speech are not indicitive of the wider Australian people and to applaud this type of hate is appalling.

I will stand up to this type of thing and so will the majority of Australians. This person is not fit to be in parliament and he should be rejected wholeheartedly by everyone, which he will be come the WA re election, and good riddance to him and his ilk:

________________________________________________________________________________________

Who is and isn't fit to be in Parliament is open to comment imo .

izabsmiling · ‎10-03-2014

@icyfroth wrote:
Scott Ludlam started it...

Did he ?

or was it those who created the need for him to give his opinion on what was going on ?

izabsmiling · ‎10-03-2014

does anything else happen if he wins the WA election ?

The message that he should be rejected wholeheartedly by the majority is the same kind of message imo as lets kick this mob out

izabsmiling · ‎10-03-2014

For the Abbott government the Court's ruling is a blow. Of the six seats up for election last September, four seats were unaffected by the closeness of the count. Those Senators whose election was not in doubt included all three elected Liberal candidates. While two Senate seats were left in doubt by the count, the only option open to the court was to void the election of all six Senators and re-run the election.

A re-election could put one of the Liberal's seats in doubt. If the Liberal Party were to lose a seat at the re-election, it would weaken the government's position in the Senate and strengthen the hand of the alliance of minor parties that has developed around the Palmer United Party.

Alternatively the Liberal Party could maintain its support from last September, and possibly turn the election into a referendum on repeal of the carbon and mining taxes.

http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2014/02/wa-senate-re-election-what-happens-next.html

**meep** · ‎10-03-2014

@freakiness wrote:
The only comments about Abbott's family have been about how he use them to futher his purposes, that I've seen or made anyway..

Did I miss the ones about his wife being a gay.

He's the one who carted his daughters around in white dresses telling people to vote for him because his daughters are attractive. He's the one who said some women deserved to be elected because of her good looks. If there are complaints or people having a dig about that it's his own fault.

I think you must have missed that and a whole lot more because I cannot imagine you justifying it, I really can't.

There have been comments/innuendos made about Mr Abbott, his wife and daughters that were truly disgraceful.

izabsmiling · ‎10-03-2014

I don't see those published here .That's a very obvious difference imo between the treatment of our Current and our former Government ...I wouldn't go that low not for any political figure/idol.

The interesting thing though is that some actually have an issue if other Australian pass appropriate comment which relates to the poor performance and lies and the promises our current Government made to us pre-election.

I mean seriously ? It stands out like a sore thumb.

Our Government shoudn't need people ready to attack other Australians and/or past Governments in order to defend or excuse what what our Government is paid to be accountable for.Do people not know that that clearly shows that they themselves have such little real faith in the ability of the Government to perform as they should ?

izabsmiling · ‎10-03-2014

How many times had I seen comments about our former Government not answering questions ?lol

they did .

how many questions go unanswered now ?

**meep** · ‎10-03-2014

izabsmiling wrote: I don't see those published here .

I have seen them published here.