some will end up doing a two way trip. i wonder how long before one is found back here.

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

some will end up doing a two way trip. i wonder how long before one is found back here.

---

How? Serious question, I don't know much about them at all.

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

some will end up doing a two way trip. i wonder how long before one is found back here.

---

How? Serious question, I don't know much about them at all.

 

 

---

paint it dark blue, fuel and supplies.. and push it back into the sea.

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

---

@**meep** wrote:

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

some will end up doing a two way trip. i wonder how long before one is found back here.

---

How? Serious question, I don't know much about them at all.

 

 

---

paint it dark blue, fuel and supplies.. and push it back into the sea.

---

you don't think that would have been taken into consideration?

i read somewhere the lifeboats had tamper proof engines and could not be refuelled without special equipment.  i have no idea what that special equipment could be....am curious though..

nothing mechanical is tamper proof.  i could do it, i'm certain a third world innovator could.

How would you know that when Scott says....????

https://www.google.com.au/#q=operational+matters+scott+morrison

SCOTT MORRISON:

Well, Leigh, as you know, we don't comment one way or the other on reports of things of that nature that go to

maritime operations

The only reports I have read tell of the locals stripping the boats, the motors and anything else salable then leaving them where they found

them on the shoreline, that they do become a bit of a tourist attraction and a source of novelty for the local kids.......

I do know this and it is/was widely reported

Abbott had left SBY no alternative.

"He ordered co-operation with Australia halted across a wide range of

activities including Operation Sovereign Borders.

That is where it remains today."

As ex –military I understand the cost benefits that drones provide, particularly when it comes to surface targets and surveillance.

My point was this, the operational area is off the north coast of Australia, but the drones are the located over 3000 km away in Adelaide.  This means a 6000km round trip to get to the area of operation and return to base.  Now do the math on the amount of extra fuel expended and maintenance costs incurred as district to having the aircraft bases somewhere closer to the operational area, such as say Tindal.

That is there is no rational reason for these aircraft to be based in Adelaide excepting one - the state election.  This means we have a PM who on the one hand preaches austerity, but then, when it suits his political agenda, is prepared to splash money around like a drunken sailor in a bordello.