Why can 't Alarmists use Climate scientists to support their views Iza.......Skeptics certainly can.....
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
Yep.......that's negligent.....practiced by Alarmists.
As the 15 year pause continues, Alarmists will just become more desperate.......poor Alarmists.
Cherry Picking done by The Author (see below) to suit the Authors desired message ....I did spot the psychology behind the message .Did you ?
SATURDAY, APRIL 5, 2014
Anthony Watts is over the moon. He's been told there's a paper that says it's okay for him and other science deniers to keep lying about climate. Of course that's not the tack that Anthony is taking. (Archived here.)
Irony: manipulating information to stoke a conspiracy theory
The paper itself is reporting research on whether exaggerations in news reporting and environmental activism makes a difference to participation by countries in international environmental agreements and if so to what extent. It found that ex post suggests yes, whileex ante is ambiguous. The research is based on a model, which seems to have passed by WUWT-ers. (Normally deniers poo poo any research based on a model, but not in this case.)
PS. Here's another paper by one of the authors, for people interested in the general subject of the economics and politics of international environmental agreements (downloadable).
From the WUWT comments
Climate disinformer Anthony Watts has told a big fat lie. As usual he implies that climate scientists are the culprits. The abstract says nothing about climate scientists. It is talking about news media and "some pro-environmental organizations". And it doesn't give the "permission" or "advocate" anything. It certainly doesn't advocate that Anthony Watts and other deniers and disinformers lie. But that's what Anthony does to supplement his income and push his cause. And a prime example is this very article (archived here).
The conspiracy wingnuts come out in force
