---

@izabsmiling wrote:

Are you game enough to name the scientists amongst those who are endorsees and prove their findings wrong ?

or do you know what it would mean and take on your part to do so ?

since they could prove their work in a court room ...

---

prove it in court

good luck with that

---

@sarah308 wrote:

73 posts from you on this thread and mostly all massive c&p posts.. yes i was bored and counted them and thats 10 minutes of my life i wont ever get back 🙂

 

 

 

obsessive much me thinks with the amount of post

 

 

---

Maybe I am....but I AM only by 1 .Not 3

Your opinion is that of the minority......... giggle......thank goodness.......

---

@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:

Your opinion is that of the minority......... giggle......thank goodness.......

---

it sure is

74 post now is that a record for post in ones own thread

What the heck is my opinion worth on this matter .............ziltch.I am not one of the many experts who reached the consensus based on science lol

 it isn't opinion its fact. its you and yer mates who have the opinions and no facts. people paid to lie by big energy do not produce facts but propoganda . if you align yourself with them giiggles more fool you for having your opinion bought and paid for.

---

@*mrgrizz* wrote:

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

Are you game enough to name the scientists amongst those who are endorsees and prove their findings wrong ?

or do you know what it would mean and take on your part to do so ?

since they could prove their work in a court room ...

---

prove it in court

 

good luck with that

---

Well I am not a scientist Mr Grizz. and I am not calling them liars ,saying they fudge their fiindings or suggesting that the 97% of the scientific community WW who endorse climate change knows nothing or wants to con us all.

Re Court ..you read a couple of posts back you will see that it has been done .

nope i won't be reading pages and pages of words to try and find some claim.

where do you get this figure of 97% from?