Re: Direct Action fraud exposure iminent

nero_bolt · ‎13-04-2014

Poor alarmists must be so hard *giggle*

Excellent read here for the alarmists

http://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Community-Spirit/No-global-warming-for-17-years-8-months/m-p/1141723...

nero_bolt · ‎13-04-2014

boris1gary · ‎13-04-2014

boris1gary · ‎13-04-2014

@lakeland27 wrote:
hunt keeps sidestepping these questions . any comments nero ?
direct action is a dud that will cost us billions. can you justify it ?

apparently not, cartoons though.

View solution in original post

joz*garage · ‎13-04-2014

do i see an outing?! *chuckles

Signatures suck.

donnashuggy · ‎13-04-2014

@joz*garage wrote:
do i see an outing?! *chuckles

I see someone incapable of defending Direct Action.

just_me_karen · ‎13-04-2014

Nero giggles can u please explain to me how direct action will work when national parks are unlocked for clear felling whilst a green army of unprotected slaves plants trees.

How many baby trees will we need to plant to cover the carbon load of each massive old growth rainforest tree?

.

spotweldersfriend · ‎13-04-2014

I've been an adviser to heads of state in the past.I just wish they'd called on me before deciding on this course of (in)action 😞

boris1gary · ‎13-04-2014

@just_me_karen wrote:
Nero giggles can u please explain to me how direct action will work when national parks are unlocked for clear felling whilst a green army of unprotected slaves plants trees.

How many baby trees will we need to plant to cover the carbon load of each massive old growth rainforest tree?

clearly the answer is 7 - 4 + 4 which is 3. giggle, giggle, snort. snort, hiccup, hiccup.......

lakeland27 · ‎13-04-2014

@nero_wulf wrote:
Poor alarmists must be so hard *giggle*

Excellent read here for the alarmists

http://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Community-Spirit/No-global-warming-for-17-years-8-months/m-p/1141723...

this is in fact fairly correct nero. someone seems to actually get it. so it must get a green tinge.