@poddster wrote:I don't, never have, never will condone shoddy workmanship or anything shoddy in any way.
However I have witnessed some of the contracts that the Labor Government has entered into and they are way beyond shoddy.
I also have no doubt that towards the end of Labor'd exit into oblivion they would have laid booby traps anywhere they could.
Going on past history it will take many years to clean up the mess that they created at the cost of mega buck to the taxpayer.
That is what Labor do best.
you seem to miss a lot. only in the last 24 hrs its been revealed that turnbull is in fact doing what he (and yourself here) accuse the former govt of doing. the real difference is not money, it isn't slack work practices. the difference is the end result .. a vastly inferior network . they wont save a cent, it wont be 'tidier' it will merely be inferior. 
@poddster wrote:OK LL, let us open up the can of worms once again.
I'll start.
The NBN as sold to the voters was and is a conjob, it was a white elephant from the start and it is still around but it is now a rotting hulk.
You say that the proposed version is vastly inferior, ok, elaborate on your statement and show just how it is vastly inferior.
Trot out any argument you can come up with 🙂
i think its time for you to defend turnbulls actions, the benefits of the NBN are well established, thats why the government said it would build it ''better.. cheaper'' so far that hasn't proven to be the case. turnbull kept claiming that the labor NBN didn't have a business plan.. the link i provided indicates turnbull has no 'business plan' which puts all his claims in real doubt
