---

@2106greencat wrote:

Reacted to the OP - and I stand by that.

 

Have to admit, I rarely click on links so did not know there was another side, still, easy to say one thing and mean another hey?

 

Of course no-one would 'admit' to money being the reason - they need to remove money from the equation - Forgive or not ?

---

People rarely click on the links, I've found, cat. I hardly ever do unless I'm really really really interested.

see that's my prblem Icy - I read the OP, can't be bothered with the link, and then just shoot from the hip LOL

i'll learn one day

.....

nah, I prolly won't, I'll just keep doin' it, coz it's fun!

---

@2106greencat wrote:

Reacted to the OP - and I stand by that.

 

Have to admit, I rarely click on links so did not know there was another side, still, easy to say one thing and mean another hey?

 

Of course no-one would 'admit' to money being the reason - they need to remove money from the equation - Forgive or not ?

---

  well i would admit that if someone did something similar to one of my own chuldren i might react with violence. i'm not violent generally and i oppose the death penalty.. but i am capable of it  .  i've found that out the hard way .

---

@2106greencat wrote:

see that's my prblem Icy - I read the OP, can't be bothered with the link, and then just shoot from the hip LOL

 

i'll learn one day

 

.....

 

nah, I prolly won't, I'll just keep doin' it, coz it's fun!

 

 

---

You'd have to have a lot of time on your hands to read every bloody link, cat. Actually, unless the poster puts some kind of pre-story or title to the their link, I rarely bother with clicking on to it.

Too much other stuff to read.

*waves back 

I just find the money exchange to be a bit off. Whichever country, culture or law it is.

What happens to those who can't raise enough money to buy their forgiveness?

How can it be a just system of law when some people have access to immunity but not others, even though their crimes may be similar?

If you're going to have the death penalty, then I reckon you have to have it, not just a Claytons one where money and emotion decide the outcome. I reckon it needs to be applied impartially, without emotion or consideration of money or status.

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

 I actually found that story a lot more satisfying than the clogged death row situation in the states. The victims mother showing forgiveness.. seeing the stupidity of old testament 'eye for eye' (islam and christendom aren't too different) makes that woman an enlightened person in my book. like the chap kenny from adelaide who lost his son in Bali, she was able to rise above the primitive base instincts such as revenge. that is a story of hope.

---

I liked how she slapped him.

I would have liked the situation a whole lot more if money wasn't involved. I don't get why a law would leave immunity up to those who can generate enough money to buy it.

I reckon if immunity is to be a possibility, then it needs to be applied equally.

i think the issue of money the least significant aspect of the story.

that story aside, it is obviously a consideration under Sharia Law and a part of that culture.

It surprised me. We studied Sharia Law at uni, but we never learned about that.