@lakeland27 wrote:

its a matter of being slack. i could put it differently, but i find neither of you worth expending effort on. .

however i choose to word it makes no difference to the case you guys present anyway, completely debunked rubbish for the somewhat challenged.


What theory were you referring to?.......Woman Happy  You made a statement.... back it up.....



____________________________
"High and low pressure systems cause the day-to-day changes in our weather." ...Metoffice.......


siggie-reported-by-alarmists..............

You might like this Nero....time for some Dr Roy Spencer...

 

 

1) No Recent Warming. If global warming science is so “settled”, why did global warming stop over 15 years ago (in most temperature datasets), contrary to all “consensus” predictions?

 

2) Natural or Manmade? If we don’t know how much of the warming in the longer term (say last 50 years) is natural, then how can we know how much is manmade?

 

3) IPCC Politics and Beliefs. Why does it take a political body (the IPCC) to tell us what scientists “believe”? And when did scientists’ “beliefs” translate into proof? And when was scientific truth determined by a vote…especially when those allowed to vote are from the Global Warming Believers Party?

 

4) Climate Models Can’t Even Hindcast How did climate modelers, who already knew the answer, still fail to explain the lack of a significant temperature rise over the last 30+ years? In other words, how to you botch a hindcast?

 

5) …But We Should Believe Model Forecasts? Why should we believe model predictions of the future, when they can’t even explain the past?

 

6) Modelers Lie About Their “Physics”. Why do modelers insist their models are based upon established physics, but then hide the fact that the strong warming their models produce is actually based upon very uncertain “fudge factor” tuning?

 

7) Is Warming Even Bad? Who decided that a small amount of warming is necessarily a bad thing?

 

😎 Is CO2 Bad? How did carbon dioxide, necessary for life on Earth and only 4 parts in 10,000 of our atmosphere, get rebranded as some sort of dangerous gas?

 

9) Do We Look that Stupid? How do scientists expect to be taken seriously when their “theory” is supported by both floods AND droughts? Too much snow AND too little snow?

 

10) Selective Pseudo-Explanations. How can scientists claim that the Medieval Warm Period (which lasted hundreds of years), was just a regional fluke…yet claim the single-summer (2003) heat wave in Europe had global significance?



____________________________
"High and low pressure systems cause the day-to-day changes in our weather." ...Metoffice.......


siggie-reported-by-alarmists..............

All you had to say was 'Roy Spencer' . anyone with a little knowledge of the topic knows that means '' imaginings and theories of a fundamentalist dreamer'' not a credible source, a losing position before you typed another word. Smiley Happy gurgle .

 

 

And to think Spencer's research work is funded by NASA, NOAA, DOE and the DOT....giggle....It seems he is credible.....

 

 

Now......what theory did you say I believe in?..........



____________________________
"High and low pressure systems cause the day-to-day changes in our weather." ...Metoffice.......


siggie-reported-by-alarmists..............

It seems like that rested case is getting restive

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

......giggle......poor alarmist......



____________________________
"High and low pressure systems cause the day-to-day changes in our weather." ...Metoffice.......


siggie-reported-by-alarmists..............


@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:

......giggle......poor alarmist......


I agree

 

They seem to forget that there hasnt been any warming for

 

No global warming for 17 years 8 months

 

http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/03/04/updated-global-temperature-no-global-warming-for-17-years-6-m...

 

 

10291354_672499396118620_3953498742732540636_n.jpg

 

 

10169255_624883940935282_4290015918305149782_n.jpg

Never Before Has There Been So Much Ice At This Time Of Year Since Measurements Began”! -

 

 

 

 

See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2014/05/02/spiegel-on-antaractic-sea-ice-never-before-has-there-been-so-much...

 


Polar Bears Threatened by Too Much Arctic Ice

 

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/04/29/climate-change-polar-bears-threatened-too-much-arctic-ice

 

When the polar bear was put on the endangered species list back in 2008, it became the first species to be put on the list based on what might happen with the environment and their habitat. Environmental groups argued that global warming served as a major threat to the polar bear and therefore it must be added to the endangered list just in case someday it actually becomes endangered due to climate change.

 

Now just a few short years later, polar bears in Alaska are facing a major problem: too much ice. CNSNews has the details:

Five meters of ice– about 16 feet thick - is threatening the survival of polar bears in the Southern Beaufort Sea region along Alaska’s Arctic coast, according to Dr. Susan J. Crockford, an evolutionary biologist in British Columbia who has studied polar bears for most of her 35-year career.

 

That’s because the thick ice ridges could prevent ringed seals, the bears’ major prey, from creating breathing holes they need to survive in the frigid waters, Crockford told CNSNews.com.


@spotweldersfriend wrote:
Yes the same people who deny climate change will have you believe it rained for 40 days and flooded the whole planet while some drunk built a boat large enough to house a pair of each of the world's animals.Priceless lol giggle smirk

hahahaha, el spotto a spot funny


Signatures suck.