- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-05-2014 01:10 AM
They should have kept selling the houses to the tenants so they could keep building more houses for new tenants, years ago.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-05-2014 07:06 AM
@freakiness wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:That's nice, thank you 🙂
Which ID do I use to attack other posters with because they don't agree with me?
You'd know better than me if you have that habit or not 😄
Well you see I don't think I do have that habit.
I'm wondering if you know something I don't.
I really don't "go after" posters.
I find it hard to maintain grudges which I sometimes think is one of my many character flaws.
Certainly I can't be bothered "going after" posters just because they happen to have a different opinion to mine.
I think it's bad forum etiquette to carry a grudge from one post to another.
But that's just me.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-05-2014 07:30 AM
Or the families forced to live in a caravan that is more pricey than a house and they need help to pay it!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-05-2014 09:16 AM
@freddie*rooster wrote:It's a beat up, you only need drive around a Department of Housing area to see how many vacant neglected homes there are, it would appear to me a bomb under those who administer the Department would be the first step to puting and end to the need to claim the BS of this report.
Yep. anything to deflect
