- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 05-07-2014 05:37 PM
Backs out heads off *waves*
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 05-07-2014 05:41 PM
It's getting so we feel obliged to smile and nod at every post?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 05-07-2014 05:42 PM
In this case those that were interviewed all gave very similar accounts of how Harris abused them - they did not know each other, nor know what others had written in their statements.
If there was only one complainant.. It would be their word against a well known and well regarded person.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 05-07-2014 05:44 PM
🙂 and nods
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on
05-07-2014
05:45 PM
- last edited on
06-07-2014
01:10 PM
by
underbat
@just*duff wrote:
I heard the painting was taken down ages ago when this first came out.
And his knighthood will be taken back before too long.
No! never!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 05-07-2014 05:49 PM
4 July
The Attorney Generals Office have confirmed that (on their Twitter account)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 05-07-2014 06:14 PM
Any one who has been part of a jury, were you happy with your verdict? or do you wonder about it still?
The thing is, without actual evidence or dna, pics etc, how do we really know they got it right? I keep seeing the news say "he shows no remorse".................. how does remorse look?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on
05-07-2014
06:18 PM
- last edited on
06-07-2014
01:27 PM
by
underbat
@just*duff wrote:
I heard the painting was taken down ages ago when this first came out.
And his knighthood will be taken back before too long.
Cliff Richards? And where would your evidence be. Pretty damming comment without any shred of evidence. If he was accused and charged then I'd be the first to jump up and down but you can't just throw his name out there because you 'think' he might be.
Can I also point out that the term "kiddy fiddler" just exacerbates the notion that fiddling with children is not as bad as sexually abusing them. Abuse is abuse and any lessening of what the truth of it is only makes it more difficult for people to take it seriously. It is an outmoded term.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 05-07-2014 06:24 PM
I am sorry, I don't agree that it is a "lesser" term, either is as bad as the other.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on
05-07-2014
06:26 PM
- last edited on
06-07-2014
01:27 PM
by
underbat
@just*duff wrote:
I heard the painting was taken down ages ago when this first came out.
And his knighthood will be taken back before too long.
I dont believe Cliff Richards is a pedophile, and have you got evidence to back that up?
Just because he hasnt married, doesnt mean a thing,
So, I would like to know where you got your info fromn?