icyfroth
Community Member
In response to boris1gary

on ‎12-08-2014 08:00 PM

billobillobill.jpg

0 Helpful

icyfroth
Community Member
In response to cherry*135

on ‎12-08-2014 08:25 PM

@am*3 wrote:
Icy you got the title a lot wrong ( unless you ARE a Bill Shorten fan?)
It's irrelevant, Am lol.
i choose not to read the blurb written in the Herald or wherever your link goes to.
You don't have to, the gist of the article is in the body of my post.

 

0 Helpful

cherry*135
Community Member
In response to icyfroth

‎12-08-2014 08:47 PM - edited ‎12-08-2014 08:49 PM

Why is the title of a thread irrelevant?

It is s the main indication of what a thread is about. Like a newspaper headline... It is what grabs a persons attention, then they decide from that whether they will read on.

icyfroth
Community Member
In response to cherry*135

on ‎12-08-2014 09:14 PM

@am*3 wrote:
Why is the title of a thread irrelevant?
*sigh* it's irrelevant that you think there's a lot wrong with the thread and I think there's just a bit wrong.


It is s the main indication of what a thread is about. Like a newspaper headline... It is what grabs a persons attention, then they decide from that whether they will read on.

 

0 Helpful

the_great_she_elephant
Community Member
In response to icyfroth

on ‎12-08-2014 10:06 PM

@icyfroth wrote:

billobillobill.jpg

Let me help you out, Icy.

 

 "They believe it's a mistake to tell people what they really  think, but in fact their way of thinking is erroneous  in the first place." 

cherry*135
Community Member
In response to the_great_she_elephant

on ‎12-08-2014 10:29 PM

Icy: *sigh* it's irrelevant that you think there's a lot wrong with the thread and I think there's just a bit wrong.


No it isn't. My view is just as relevant as yours. I never said there's a lot wrong with the THREAD either. Only the title. If the title wasn't so weird I wouldn't be in here.
0 Helpful

karliandjacko
Community Member
In response to cherry*135

on ‎12-08-2014 10:43 PM

@am*3 wrote:
Icy: *sigh* it's irrelevant that you think there's a lot wrong with the thread and I think there's just a bit wrong.


No it isn't. My view is just as relevant as yours. I never said there's a lot wrong with the THREAD either. Only the title. If the title wasn't so weird I wouldn't be in here.

The title is rather confusing. The title contradicts the content..... but...... sometimes the news headlines do that too for some odd reason.

0 Helpful

lightningdance
Community Member

on ‎13-08-2014 07:38 AM

**SIGH** What does it matter? the article is there to read so read it and move on......sooooo funnySmiley LOL

icyfroth
Community Member
In response to the_great_she_elephant

on ‎13-08-2014 09:03 AM

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:

billobillobill.jpg

Let me help you out, Icy.

 

 "They believe it's a mistake to tell people what they really  think, but in fact their way of thinking is erroneous  in the first place." 

Thanks She-el, that helped a lot 🙂

lightningdance
Community Member

on ‎13-08-2014 09:22 AM

Commenting on political threads is a good thing only if you know what the subject is that you are commenting on.

 

Conroy and Carr,  educate yourselves before you make the  assertion that it means bob carr who is no longer a member of parliament, a fact that is widely known if you follow politics.

 

How  their maneuvers  exposes Labor for the sham "fairness" of preselection they crow about.

 

The two big union heavies will be preselected because shorten can't go against them or he will lose his leadership position, a position he believes he is entitled to even though the ballot that put him there was cooked and Albo was the real winner.

 

I hope that helps,  remember, google is there for anyone who can be bothered to do a bit of research so you are armed with the facts before making a statement.

 

 

 

0 Helpful