---

@azureline** wrote:

There could be many reasons she didn't report it before this but..............the way she did is probably indicative of her not being traumatised over it (still)

I suspect a report to the police would be your usual response wouldn't it?

I don't know if she is being truthful but with no evidence, no actual witnesses and the investigation done, it's time to let it go....... or take further civil action.

---

Not being traumatised? time to get over it?  time to let it go? omg,  tell that to the abused.

---

@azureline** wrote:

There could be many reasons she didn't report it before this but..............the way she did is probably indicative of her not being traumatised over it (still)

I suspect a report to the police would be your usual response wouldn't it?

I don't know if she is being truthful but with no evidence, no actual witnesses and the investigation done, it's time to let it go....... or take further civil action.

---

Apparently she reported it on facebook first when she saw Shorten had become leader.  Which leaves the question of why she did nothing while he was in government.  I don't see how him becoming leader would be more traumatising for her than being on front bench of government.  

& on twitter on Kevin Rudd's page also after Shorten had become leader. There is something very odd about the way that was all done, 20 years later

another odd thing is that all the murdoch papers ran with this old story just a few days ago, must be deflecting from the tax issue or something

---

@debra9275 wrote:

another odd thing is that all the murdoch papers ran with this old story just a few days ago, must be deflecting from the tax issue or something

---

Well, the burqa thing has lost its momentum, so onto something else.

Did you think it "odd" when Rolf Harris was accused and later convicted the time period between those events was about the same.

But of course Rolf is not a pollie that has to be protected is he.

didn't Rolf Harris abuse children? yes, that is very different imo

Harris's victims were children, some as young as 7.

And he was protected, big time.

very, very different scenario polks

---

@poddster wrote:

Did you think it "odd" when Rolf Harris was accused and later convicted the time period between those events was about the same.

 

But of course Rolf is not a pollie that has to be protected is he.

 

 

---

There were a lot more people telling the same sort of story about Rolf Harris and he was a much older at the time of the incidents.