---

@karliandjacko wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@freddie*rooster wrote:

A wonderful Prime Minister who was derided and attacked by the jealous boys who so desperately wanted her job.

 

Well done Julia Gillard you are a women of substance stand proud and tall there are many Australians who admire you.

---

Yeah wonderful.

 

Came into her Prime Ministership by stabbing her boss in the back.

 

Couldn't retain her Prime Ministership because her own party saw her as a liability.

 

Remains answerable for corruption charges brought against her which are so mired in inconsistencies nobody either can, or has the stamina  to penetrate.

 

Can see why she's no longer in politics.

 

 

---

What corruption charges?

She has answered every accusation about corruption clearly, numerous times, including under oath at a royal commission.

---

Yeah well I suppose "I can't recall" is an answer of sorts, lol.

---

@freddie*rooster wrote:

(((hugz icy))) have a lovely night.

---

Stop trying to invade my personal space, Freddie 

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@karliandjacko wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@freddie*rooster wrote:

A wonderful Prime Minister who was derided and attacked by the jealous boys who so desperately wanted her job.

 

Well done Julia Gillard you are a women of substance stand proud and tall there are many Australians who admire you.

---

Yeah wonderful.

 

Came into her Prime Ministership by stabbing her boss in the back.

 

Couldn't retain her Prime Ministership because her own party saw her as a liability.

 

Remains answerable for corruption charges brought against her which are so mired in inconsistencies nobody either can, or has the stamina  to penetrate.

 

Can see why she's no longer in politics.

 

 

---

What corruption charges?

She has answered every accusation about corruption clearly, numerous times, including under oath at a royal commission.

---

Yeah well I suppose "I can't recall" is an answer of sorts, lol.

---

Can you recall where you ate dinner on a specific date 20 years ago?

Can you rcall what you had for breakfast on the 7th October 1996?

Can you recall which chair you sat in on the 25th july 1997?

Can you recall who you had coffee with on the 18th May 2994?

Or would your answer to such mundane questions be "I can't recall"?

Why do you expect Gillard would have prefect recall to answer that type of question?

Aww - hugs are better for all than violence, hate and anger.

Yeah well I suppose "I can't recall" is an answer of sorts, lol.

Did she use those exacts words? those words have the smell of LNP MP's  and a Senator or two, past and present at ICAC's inquiries. Howard & Downer in the AWB inquiry too.

JULIA GILLARD: I had no knowledge at that time or knowledge at any time about the banking arrangements for the Workplace Reform Association

JULIA GILLARD: $5,000 in those days was a lot of money. I think I would remember it, had it occurred.

JULIA GILLARD: None of us get to go in a time machine and go backwards. Obviously, if one got to do the whole thing again, you would do things differently given what I know now.

JG  No. This would have been a job that took me in total- oh, I don't recall specifically, but I would have said inthe order of three, four,  five hours work at most.

Yes, there were a few I don't recalls.

Remains answerable for corruption charges brought against her which are so mired in inconsistencies nobody either can, or has the stamina  to penetrate.

I think the subtleties of the English Language have eluded you again. An accusation' which can be made by anyone on the flimsiest of evidence - or no evidence at all - is not the same as a charge, which has to be brought by proper authorities  and answered to in a Court Of Law. when Julia Gillard appeared before the Royal Commission, she was answering questions - not pleading to charges. No charges of any kind have ever been brought against Julia Gillard.

So some still harping on with disappointment that the waste of money witch hunt was a dismal failure, so much so that brandis decides to extend it - $60 odd million so far and nothing but an LNP rat. Why bother wasting all our money on a political witch hunt, it doesn't matter when the court of the daily smear have already decided - guilty, guilty of something.

---

@am*3 wrote:

JULIA GILLARD: I had no knowledge at that time or knowledge at any time about the banking arrangements for the Workplace Reform Association

 

JULIA GILLARD: $5,000 in those days was a lot of money. I think I would remember it, had it occurred.

 

JULIA GILLARD: None of us get to go in a time machine and go backwards. Obviously, if one got to do the whole thing again, you would do things differently given what I know now.

 

 

---

Thanks Am.

All of the above equate to: I CAN'T RECALL!

sheesh.