---

@lightningdance wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

That's an Italian suppository.  

---

 

"He might be thinking of Bolt."  :

 

 

Obscene and abhorrent innuendo violates CS rules.

---

No prizes for seconds.

well I had never heard of rowan dean, so I had to google it - I will now try to forget him

 

http://www.crikey.com.au/2014/08/18/media-briefs-emmo-v-bolt-bad-news-for-news-corp-vive-la-revoluti...

 

And on The Bolt Report, Rowan Dean wrapped it all up by describing Eatock v Bolt as a complaint by “dark-skinned albinos”, at which Bolt gave a chuckle. Thank god that’s not racist, otherwise you’d have to conclude such people were scum. —  Guy Rundle

---

@lightningdance wrote:

 

The topic is Plibersek making cheap political mileage out of a human catastrophe.

---

Would you please explain?  How is calling for Australia to do our bit about controlling Ebola "cheap political mileage"? 

---

@am*3 wrote:
Bolt will probably have Rowan Dean on his show this week. After all, he only invites guests that are going to say exactly what he wants them to say.
Joono

Exactly. His show remains on TV not because of a large amount of viewers but because he has the support of L. Murdoch and G. Rhinehart..he is a mouthpiece for them.

---

 

 

The topic is Plibersek making cheap political mileage out of a human catastrophe. Derailing much?

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/ebola-reaching-our-region-would-be-catastrophi...

 

As a top World Health Organisation official warned of the "huge" consequences of an Asian outbreak, Labor's foreign affairs spokeswoman Tanya Plibersek continued to press the Abbott government to send Australian medical teams and technical experts to tackle the outbreak at its source in West Afric

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

---

@lightningdance wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

That's an Italian suppository.  

---

 

"He might be thinking of Bolt."  :

 

 

Obscene and abhorrent innuendo violates CS rules.

---

No prizes for seconds.

---

You already took out  first prize.

There are plenty of articles available online of Tanya Pilbersek giving her views (direct quotes) on the Ebola situation.

Why did you not quote one of those LD if you are SERIOUSLY concerned by what she said? You could have addressed each point she made and given your reasons why you think she was wrong.

That would be a discussion. What you started here is cheap shot for political mileage, which cheapens a human catastrophe.

so are you saying that her asking for more to be done is a cheap political shot?

 

 

 

OK

I think the op would rather not do that because heaven forbid she just might agree with Tanya. Unlikely but miracles can happen.

The opening post immediate source is Bolt's blog. There is nothing wrong with commenting on the source of articles in an opening post.

The OP could have written an opening post in their chosen subject in THEIR OWN WORDs, if they had Bolt wouldn't have been mentioned.

What did Tanya Pilbersek say that you disagreed with and what are your reasons for disagreeing with her?. If you genuinely want a discussion about her, then you won't get one until YOU put up a genuine argument in your own words, for discussion.