- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-10-2014 11:45 AM
@lightningdance wrote:
@polksaladallie wrote:
@lightningdance wrote:
@polksaladallie wrote:That's an Italian suppository.
"He might be thinking of Bolt."
:
Obscene and abhorrent innuendo violates CS rules.
No prizes for seconds.
You already took out first prize.
Thanks. I knew I was superior. ![]()
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-10-2014 11:46 AM
@am*3 wrote:
There are plenty of articles available online of Tanya Pilbersek giving her views (direct quotes) on the Ebola situation.
Why did you not quote one of those LD if you are SERIOUSLY concerned by what she said? You could have addressed each point she made and given your reasons why you think she was wrong.
That would be a discussion. What you started here is cheap shot for political mileage, which cheapens a human catastrophe.
Not at all and what we are served up on here as comment is less than savoury by all the respondents so far on here.
We have been witness to the old Labor one two game.
Shorten pretends he's bi partisan then he sends his attack dog out to derail the bi partisanship so he looks clean. It's a stratedgy they have been running all week, its transparent and repetetive Labor behaviour.
Now I don't expect any of you on here to know just what has been afoot as you don't seem to read anything until something is posted on here.
Sometimes I'm amazed at the opinions of some on here when they don't know what it is they are talking about, just the tired old knee jerk outrage.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-10-2014 11:48 AM
@lightningdance wrote:
The topic is Plibersek making cheap political mileage out of a human catastrophe. Derailing much?
No, the OP uses a deadly health crisis to attack what I assume to be Plibersek. As her name is not used we rely on assumption.
Btw, you got the spelling wrong in the title compared to the C&P content.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
18-10-2014 11:48 AM - edited 18-10-2014 11:52 AM
You laugh at Tanya Pilbersek re Ebola comments.. You are laughing at both...please treat this human catastrophe seriously.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
18-10-2014 11:52 AM - edited 18-10-2014 11:52 AM
oh OK, so one side of politics is a suppository of wisdom & the other side are only playing pretendies ( I so wish I was a mind reader)
LD I don't go out of my way to read trashy articles, I only read some of them when they're posted on here
the article in the OP is not funny ( people are dying from ebola right now)
it's not clever (its a cheap political shot & nothing more )
& it's not true.( like most blogs and articles those people write)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-10-2014 11:54 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-10-2014 12:00 PM
@karliandjacko wrote:
@lightningdance wrote:
The topic is Plibersek making cheap political mileage out of a human catastrophe. Derailing much?
No, the OP uses a deadly health crisis to attack what I assume to be Plibersek. As her name is not used we rely on assumption.
Btw, you got the spelling wrong in the title compared to the C&P content.
What on earth...lol the spelling police now? I am not using the ebola outbreak to "attack". Please try to keep up.
The callous and disgusting antics of Plibersel this week is her making the most of a human catastrophe to make cheap political mileage out of it.
If you kept up you would have read the smack down Greg Hunt gave her when he said the high level meetings taken by labor and liberal have been advised that it is not advisable to order personnel into the ebola countries., meaning the military, who else? FGS.
She chose to ignore this and did what she always does, put on her po face, the "I really care so much more than anybody else" face and went out to make cheap political mileage out of a human catastrophe.
Now you can all try to deflect what you believe is a Bolt article but the facts remain, her agenda was on display all week and she should be condemned for it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-10-2014 12:02 PM
seriously, who cares what Greg Hunt saId ![]()
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
18-10-2014 12:03 PM - edited 18-10-2014 12:04 PM
It's obviously from Bolt because his dribble contains the same typo in the header.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-10-2014 12:06 PM
@debra9275 wrote:seriously, who cares what Greg Hunt saId
So you know nothing of what she has been doing all week? dont' care? was exposed for her callous politicking? woop, de doo...![]()
So never let a bit of knowledge get in the way of a good attack eh?
: