nah. But I know what you’re doing, keep it up I can’t be bothered replying to your requests.

 

 I am discussing the topic, an  endeavour that seems to elude you.

 

lol, sounds exactly like Plibersek., you got it in one.

What I am doing is asking a simple question  which you obviously can't answer. So what is it do you think I am doing? I'm no pleb when it comes to politics nor with politicians. I'm not combative so when I ask a question, it is simply me asking for an answer to something that I don't know about.

Yes you have to do a bit of reading if you want to  make an educated comment and no, I am not going to do it for you.

good luck.

 

TANYA PLIBERSEK: No humanitarian mission like this is without risk. It is absolutely right for the Government to be up front about the risks involved. In the same way that when we send Australian Defence Force personnel to northern Iraq on a humanitarian mission, we are up front about the fact that there are risks involved.

But in the same way that our Defence personnel are highly trained and highly experienced, and in many instances are wanting to go into situations like this that they know are dangerous, because they choose this work because of their commitment to helping on a global scale. So too, our health personnel that are highly trained, highly skilled, have chosen this work because they feel they can make a difference to humanity. So too, they should be supported by their Government to give the help they know they can give.

---

@briefed on why it's not More politicking by Plibersek. Of coourse she agrees with the governments stand on sending troops into ebola countries then she reverts back to her hype knowing that she has already been bluecat*dancing wrote:
TANYA PLIBERSEK: No humanitarian mission like this is without risk. It is absolutely right for the Government to be up front about the risks involved. In the same way that when we send Australian Defence Force personnel to northern Iraq on a humanitarian mission, we are up front about the fact that there are risks involved.

But in the same way that our Defence personnel are highly trained and highly experienced, and in many instances are wanting to go into situations like this that they know are dangerous, because they choose this work because of their commitment to helping on a global scale. So too, our health personnel that are highly trained, highly skilled, have chosen this work because they feel they can make a difference to humanity. So too, they should be supported by their Government to give the help they know they can give.

---

Then we get the hype from this scare monger even after she's been briefed by the top level advice she's been privvy to.

 

Anybody can say what she say's, anybody can make political mileage out of it and that's what she's doing. , she's an expert at it, has form and is whipping up fear and anger.

 

Read into it what you like but I'll bet she doesn't bring it up in parliament again, she knows what she's doing, she's been exposed for it.

 

Her weasle words are transparent.

Tanya Pilbersek comments are in line with requests from the UN and WHO (assistance required to control the spread of eBola)? She is not obliged to agree Abbott and the LNP on anything.

One article from The Australian and a quote from an opinion piece in the AFR doesn't prove anything.

Wishful thinking on your behalf 'I bet she doesn't bring it up in Parliament again'

"Labor's Tanya Plibersek steps up attack on Abbott government over lack of Ebola action"
The Abbott government's hopes of pulling the opposition into line over Ebola have evaporated, with Labor's Tanya Plibersek stepping up the criticism of the current hands-off approach as short-sighted and wholly inadequate."

Weasel words - that the best you got?

""We were briefed at the beginning of October about all the impediments to Australia sending volunteers to West Africa to assist to get this virus under control, and in the weeks subsequent it appears that the government's made little to no effort to overcome those impediments.

The strong comments came as world leaders rejected isolationist tendencies from some countries following the outbreak, with Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron calling on the developed world to "wake up" to the crisis."