- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 14-11-2014 05:15 PM
Bolt's opinion then.
This made me (the citation needed) ![]()
wikipedia - It [Bolt's blog] is now Australia's most-read political blog.[citation needed]
Heat goes on climate change policy
The Australian government naturally has the opportunity to join in and make a break from the deception and lies pumped into the election sphere during the three years before taking office. But that outcome is unlikely.
It is clear that once you label an issue as **bleep**, there is little wriggle room. Once you label extraordinary people as lacking or witch-like there is little grace left in the spiritual tank.
This is where the Abbott government's passion for dismissing people and movements is so terribly wrong. There is no turning back from the thin denials and gross nastiness. The fear and bagging garners the votes but it does not get you out of the gutter when ethical guardianship has a day like it had yesterday.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 14-11-2014 05:20 PM
From what I understand China will do nothing until 2030. USA 2% per year reductions. Won't happen.
Just more flim flam and hot air.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 14-11-2014 05:40 PM
@katymatey* wrote:From what I understand China will do nothing until 2030. USA 2% per year reductions. Won't happen.
Just more flim flam and hot air.
yes it is but it makes all the luvvies and greenies feel good
They can see post #8 above
IT doesn’t take much to fool the hopey-wishy media, as the announcement of a non-binding agreement between the US and China on global warming has so clearly demonstrated.
Labor and the Greens were also there, sucked in
and its never going to happen The lame duck Obma is simply talking through his &&&&
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-11-2014 09:54 AM
Phew, it's not ground hog day after all 😄
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-11-2014 12:14 PM
these governments of the world are globalist motivated ran by corperations that make too much money poluting the enviroment. This talk of clean energy is hogwash. if they were really serious, they would not have killed off the electric car in the late 90s. Staged the 9/11 attacks to wreck more of the enviroment, all this makes them money and works in favor of their plans for depopulation, basically, killing off the majority of people and making the rest their slaves.
I know people are gonna see this as crazy rantings, but theres so much evidence that proves it's true. it's easy to find, everywhere, kinda have to look though and some thinking is required.
However, global warming is a fact, happends naturaly but humans are spuring it on, speeding it up. It's just easy to discredit because of what governments do with the issue. While we argue about the nature of global warming, we aren't paying attention to their criminal activites, they love that.
Fun Factor : Now you have a choice in chat, factor that
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-11-2014 12:36 PM
@katymatey* wrote:From what I understand China will do nothing until 2030. USA 2% per year reductions. Won't happen.
Just more flim flam and hot air.
China will continue to build renewable power supplies until then, as they are doing now. They are trying to reduce air pollution, which is a real every day problem for them.
The view that China’s announced target is feasible but arduous is correct. It is also true that a peaking of carbon dioxide emissions in China is possible before 2025, given strong Chinese policy efforts and future changes to the rate and nature of China’s economic growth. China has extensive policies in place to constrain the growth in energy use and to shift away from coal, and under this commitment China will intensify those efforts.
It is important to understand that China’s effort is much broader even than the authors of this FactCheck suggest. The text correctly points out the importance of renewable energy expansion, but improvements in energy efficiency and the transformation of China’s economic structure towards high-value manufacturing and services will do more to dampen carbon emissions growth. In my own analysis, my colleagues and I found that a carbon dioxide peak around 2025 would be achieved by maintaining a 4% per year improvement in economy-wide energy productivity, and a 1.0-1.5% annual reduction in the carbon intensity of energy supply. The former comes through better technical efficiency and structural change, the latter through a shift from coal to gas, renewables and nuclear power. – Frank Jotzo