I was wondering if someone was going to bring up Prince Phillips war record.

 

And as for the smart **bleep** comment by someone on the thread re his award about "having a full rack of medals already",

he earnt most of them, under fire on the high seas including a bravery commendation by the Age of 20 where he saved

the ship he was on.

 

He'd be more interesting to talk to than most people.

 

 

 

Icy

Well said.

 

The Julia award to the cricketer is a very good comparison.

 

I wonder what some of the others have to say now !

 

 

 

Icy

 

No comments from the peanut gallery yet.

 

I suppose the monkies are having afternoon bananas Smiley LOL

 

 

 


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

Icy

 

No comments from the peanut gallery yet.

 

I suppose the monkies are having afternoon bananas Smiley LOL

 

 

 


Their comments not required, Vic, Woman Very Happy


Yes, agree.

Reading some of the other drivel the airheads have written,
it might take them a while to put some words together.

Gillard gave an OA.  She didn't give a knighthood to a man who is already a knight, a duke and a prince.  

She didn't venture into the realms of the dark ages and resurrect  the titles of knight and dame.

 

Phil the Greek will be sitting in Buckinghuge Palace -laughing his man boobs off.

What a silly thing for the Prime Minister to do........................................Richo.


@gleee58 wrote:

Gillard gave an OA.  She didn't give a knighthood to a man who is already a knight, a duke and a prince.  

She didn't venture into the realms of the dark ages and resurrect  the titles of knight and dame.

 


Glee

An OA is just a lower level of the same award set.

 

Most start with an OA and often rise up the list over the years.

 

 

 

 

 

All the mainstream media have it in for Abbott now, the 'Knightmare' saga tipped even the ones with right wing biases over the edge. Andrew Bolt, conservative blogger has been very scathing about Abbott's performance this week.

 

Niki Savva's article below ( Peter Costello's press secretary for six years and was then on John Howard's staff for three). Her work brought her into intimate contact with the major political players of the last 30 years.

 

The Australian

(right wing bias usually)

 

29 January 2015

 

NORMALLY, opposition parties are forced to cope with life in the wilderness. Not now. Today, and for almost 18 months, we have endured, enjoyed or been bewildered by government in the wilderness.

 

More disturbingly, the man in charge, so brilliant as opposition leader, so flawed as Prime Minister, shows few signs he is capable of leading his government out of it, and every sign the job is beyond him: that he is not up to it and might never be up to it.

 

The situation is that dire. Not because of a hostile media, a restless backbench or an effective opposition leader brimming with conviction or ideas, but because of the Prime Minister’s own actions.

 

Publicly his colleagues grappled with formulations to distance themselves from him after his decision to award a knighthood to Prince Philip without stabbing him in the front. Privately there was sorrow, anger, humiliation and as one said “utter utter disbelief” that he could do this to himself and to them. It will never be forgotten nor readily forgiven. Some were already doing ­numbers, apparently intending to impress upon him how much trouble he was in. After Monday, it acquired a deeper, more urgent focus

 

If it was an isolated incident, he might have got away with it. If everything else was going swimmingly he might have got away with it. But it is not. Far from it. Unfortunately it is only the most recent of a very, very long line of blunders and miscalculations which have undermined his authority and diminished his capacity to prosecute the government’s case for tax reform, workplace changes or budget repair.

 

His faults are more pronounced and better known to voters than were Rudd’s, while the problem with Baillieu was not that he was removed, but that he was left there too long.

 

Liberals are evaluating the qualities of potential replacements, mainly Bishop and Malcolm Turnbull, with Scott Morrison on the periphery.

 

As Foreign Minister Bishop has performed very well, however, while she remains quarantined from them, she is also untested on domestic issues.

 

Turnbull is hated inside the party as much as he is admired outside it. His prospects would ­improve if he undertook not to push for an Emissions Trading Scheme until the rest of the world moved.

 

As one senior member of the government put it, choosing a leader is not so much about deciding who is the best candidate, but who is the least worst.

 

That is how Abbott got there and if he doesn’t improve, he will go out the same way.


@vicr3000 wrote:

@gleee58 wrote:

Gillard gave an OA.  She didn't give a knighthood to a man who is already a knight, a duke and a prince.  

She didn't venture into the realms of the dark ages and resurrect  the titles of knight and dame.

 


Glee

An OA is just a lower level of the same award set.

 

Most start with an OA and often rise up the list over the years.

 

 

 


Knighthoods were abolished in Australia 1968.    What numpty reinstated them in 2014??? .. alledgedly so he could bestow one or two on Australians who deserved them?

Does everyone remember Gillard giving Tendulkar an order of Australia? She was wanting to break into India because it was booming at the time, not a peep because the media never ran with it.

 

that kind of reminds me of this fiasco

 

http://www.smh.com.au/national/brett-lee-says-he-supports-human-rights-over-bats-signing-furore-2014...

 

 

Lee and fellow former cricketer, Glenn McGrath came under fire this week after Immigration Minister Scott Morrison gave cricket bats they signed to two Indian ministers as part of a deal the government made concerning 157 asylum seekers.