idlewhile
Community Member

on ‎13-02-2015 12:55 PM

The greens are welcome to her, a morals, ethics and principle free zone, so she should fit right in.

 

As for her actions being called "whistle blowing"!  tripe,  she was seconded into doing the dirty work by that hate rag Matilda by haters of PM Abbott.

 

Sometimes it's a lively debate on here but to hear her praised for committing a criminal act by the leftists on here??  I can't write what really needs to be said about that.

0 Helpful

vicr3000
Community Member
In response to idlewhile

on ‎13-02-2015 12:57 PM

@idlewhile wrote:

The greens are welcome to her, a morals, ethics and principle free zone, so she should fit right in.

 

As for her actions being called "whistle blowing"!  tripe,  she was seconded into doing the dirty work by that hate rag Matilda by haters of PM Abbott.

 

Sometimes it's a lively debate on here but to hear her praised for committing a criminal act by the leftists on here??  I can't write what really needs to be said about that.

Idle

 

Agree, to hear some of those on here praise her, it doesn't surprise me considering the lack of a few things Smiley Wink

 

 

0 Helpful

j*oono
Community Member
In response to idlewhile

on ‎13-02-2015 01:03 PM

Does it concern you that someone tells it how it really is?

Joono

lloydslights
Community Member
In response to cherry*135

on ‎13-02-2015 01:11 PM

Will you stop editing after I start writing a response?  That's twice now.  And some changes alter my semi-prepared responses.

 

I came across a photo of her and the School's Mock Trial Team for that year.  I looked at the NSW Law Society's site which is involved in those trials - with REAL magistrates appointed.

 

How can a school not be relevant to anyone?  That seems a foolish thing to say.  

 

Below is the Exit Profile for the students of the School.

 

  • Maximised  their full academic potential
  •  Developed individual skills and talents across a range of areas
  • Developed learning strategies to equip them to be independent self motivated life long learners
  •  Developed emotional resilience, self reliance and leadership potential
  • Recognise their responsibility to the wider community
  • Developed a strong sense of social justices as well as commitment to fairness and equity

..............................................................................................................................

 

Maybe the final point in that list "inspired" her actions.

 

DEB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
0 Helpful

azureline**
Community Member
In response to icyfroth

on ‎13-02-2015 01:12 PM

@icyfroth wrote:
@azureline** wrote:
Wouldn't you ?

Wouldn't I what?

nothing sinister, no confusion, was on my phone and it automatically chooses the OP to reply to. My post was in reply to the post above mine.

0 Helpful

debra9275
Community Member
In response to lloydslights

on ‎13-02-2015 01:14 PM

@lloydslights wrote:

Ms Newman had had contact with legal eagles prior to this episode in life.

 

She had been in her school's Mock Trial Team and so therefore had guidance and advice for those scenarios by the NSW Law Society.

 

Another "who you know" situation?  

 

With the "who you know" person urging an "early appropriate guilty plea".

 

DEB

what I would like to know about that is... how much prior?? was she working at whitehouse ATT, because i can't see that she could predict the situation that happened there unless she had a crystal ball

 

however it is possible that she may have had made contacts both journalistic and legal from there yes, she seemed to have quite a lot of support from lots of lawyers, looks like they even gave her free legal support throughout her case

azureline**
Community Member
In response to debra9275

on ‎13-02-2015 01:22 PM

Does anyone know, was Mal Brough prosecuted in any way for his part in the Slipper/Ashby saga? and "hacking" into Slipper's records?

0 Helpful

idlewhile
Community Member
In response to azureline**

on ‎13-02-2015 01:28 PM

Completely off topic.

cherry*135
Community Member
In response to lloydslights

‎13-02-2015 01:29 PM - edited ‎13-02-2015 01:33 PM

@lloydslights wrote:

Will you stop editing after I start writing a response?  That's twice now.  And some changes alter my semi-prepared responses.

 

I came across a photo of her and the School's Mock Trial Team for that year.  I looked at the NSW Law Society's site which is involved in those trials - with REAL magistrates appointed.

 

How can a school not be relevant to anyone?  That seems a foolish thing to say.  Does which school you went to and/or if you were on a debating team at school, mean you WILL commit a crime in later years?

 

Below is the Exit Profile for the students of the School.

 

  • Maximised  their full academic potential
  •  Developed individual skills and talents across a range of areas
  • Developed learning strategies to equip them to be independent self motivated life long learners
  •  Developed emotional resilience, self reliance and leadership potential
  • Recognise their responsibility to the wider community
  • Developed a strong sense of social justices as well as commitment to fairness and equity

..............................................................................................................................

 

Maybe the final point in that list "inspired" her actions.

 

DEB

 

 

 

How can her schooling, what school she went to, what teams she was in at school.. be directly related to her decision to access and leak info about FA.

 

What does that assume.. Go to a good school.. lean towards criminal acts when you leave school. Go to a bad school.... ??

 

The link between school debating team and free lawyers is farcial.

 

 

We are given 5 minutes to edit a post.. I use that feature.

0 Helpful