@vicr3000 wrote:

 

Icy

 

The bit I like is "you know who" going off half cocked, "never bothered to pay any child support for the boy, for the years betwen

when that chid was born until he was 18."

 

Yet she knows full well the boy was adopted out yet conveniently forgets that so she can have a crack at Abbott.

 

Very hpocitical as well considering she is accusing someone of not paying Smiley Wink

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Any old bullsh1t will do for some, Vic.

Mr Entsch says he has a good idea who the leakers are and that they should be named.Man up,Warren.


@vicr3000 wrote:

@debra9275 wrote:

yes he did. you should get your facts straight on this.. perhaps do some research on it

 

he and his girlfriend gave up a baby for adoption. he saw the baby once in the 2 weeks his girlfriend and the baby were in hospital


So what ?

 

Who are YOU to judge him by those actions ?

 

How do you know that the GF didn't say to not visit ?

 


Saying "do not visit" doesn't make the baby disappear into the stratosphere.

How ridiculous trying make Tony Abbott look a villain because he didn't contribute to raising what he thought was his son.

 

If the baby was adopted out, neither he nor his GF would have had any more dealings with the child, as it had effectively become the adoptive parents child.

 

If he didn't visit - Once the baby was put up for adoption, any visits by the birth-parentswould have been kept to a minimum to discourage bonding.

 

And what bearing does any of this have on Mr Abbotts Government?

 

Just another muck-raking exercise by the livid left IMO.

livid left....got it in one. This is a pathetic muck raking subject designed to smear by the livids.



Professor Triggs revealed this morning during a Senate estimates hearing that the secretary of Attorney-General George Brandis's department had asked her to resign during a meeting on February 3.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-24/gillian-triggs-says-brandis-wants-her-to-quit-rights-commissio...

 

 

Prime Minister Tony Abbott doesn’t have to do one single thing to wrap up the HRC, Triggs all by herself has managed to destroy the whole show.

 

Triggs, who came back to the Senate this morning to explain and clear up the **bleep** from her last appearance managed to sink herself further into the pit. Triggs has just managed to make Gillard look like a saint.


The most disturbing factor in this circus is the... Greens and Labor are defending her with all their might.


Until now Triggs has claimed she already had “serious concerns” about the children by August of 2012, the year Labor made her the commission’s president, and by February 2013 had decided to hold her inquiry, yet waited another year before announcing it because it would have been “very dangerous politically” to have held the inquiry during the 2013 election campaign. She also noted that it was a decade since the previous inquiry into children in detention:
But today, called back before a Senate estimates committee to clear up, among other things, her conflicting answers at her previous appearance and address documents requested from her, she now claims she didn’t formally decide hold an inquiry until December 2013.


Triggs must have been happy with the boats coming and children in detention. What a nice little UN person she is, Triggs needs to be sacked and most definitely not offered a job in any government department, she has to go.

 

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/triggs_admits_her_inquiry...


@idlewhile wrote:

livid left....got it in one. This is a pathetic muck raking subject designed to smear by the livids.


You didn't have to dredge through weeks of posts to bring it up again.  

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-23/triggs-detention/6083476

 

"Where was the Human Rights Commission when there were almost 2,000 children in detention?" he asked Neil Mitchell on Melbourne radio. "Frankly, Neil, this is a blatantly partisan, politicised exercise and the Human Rights Commission ought to be ashamed of itself."

 

Attorney-General George Brandis was also critical of the report's timing.

 

"The Government is disappointed and surprised that the Australian Human Rights Commission did not start this inquiry until 2014, considering the problem was at its most acute prior to the 2013 election, when the number of children in detention peaked at 1,992 under the former Labor Government in July 2013," he said in a statement accompanying the tabling of the report in the Senate.

 


 
 
 

 

But the commission's president Gillian Triggs defended the timing, telling a press conference that when the number of children in detention reached its peak in July 2013, children were being held only for a short period of time and were being released in their hundreds.

 

  • The claim: Australian Human Rights Commission president Gillian Triggs says in the first months of the Coalition Government the time children spent in immigration detention "was reaching quite exceptional levels".
  • The verdict: Data provided to the commission by the immigration department shows the number of children in detention for over three months more than doubled in the first months after the Coalition took office. In January 2014 it was the highest it had been in five years. Immigration department data shows that the overall number of people in long-term detention, which can be extrapolated to children, continued to increase during 2014, and only declined in late 2014. Professor Triggs is correct.

 

 

 

 

 

If you watch the proceedings you get better information than if you rely on rants of Bolt and the misogynists who hate her.   

Did Bolt comment on the male senators speaking over her just so they could hear a man's voice?

I think bolts facts are in his head  Woman Frustrated