---

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
I want to know how many were abused from 2007 to Sept 2013 and what was done about it ?

---

What difference would it make, is 233 not enough to shock you?

The reason the contents of the report  hasn't been mentioned by any politicians (bar Turnbull) is because BOTH major parties  know they have blood on their hands and neither of them are willing to admit it. That's why they are playing politics over who said or did what to whom and and why.

---

Turnbull is not the first to comment on the contents.  I don't think he's the first coalition member to speak either although I might be mistaken.  I'll try to remember who so I can search for a link.  

---

@vicr3000 wrote:

Not low, and if it was, you are a good teacher.

---

It was a very low act to bring that up. It has nothing to do with Ms Triggs position she holds now, nothing to do with her report and nothing to do with the topic of this thread.. what about the children (abuse of, in detention centres)

icy, is the first person to complain loudly if pollies children are brought into threads discussing their parents politicial activites.. yet goes and posts the above quick as a  flash. Without even bothering to post any comments about the threads actual topic.

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
Glee

Why only since march 2014 ?

What about those abused 2007 - 2013 ?

What about them ?

Why no report ?

BECAUSE THERE WAS A COVER UP BY LABOR

---

If you lsitened or read you would know.

You sound like Senator Macdonald who said he had no intention of reading the report because it is a political stitch up, or words to that effect.

There was an enquiry or report in 2012.  

Here's a link, full of good information straight from the horses mouth with a good dose of sexist bullying for good measure..

http://parlview.aph.gov.au/mediaPlayer.php?videoID=253293&operation_mode=parlview

If it was the parents  who abused their kids then they have the 'duty of care'

The media ALWAYS try to sensationalise every happening. and the uninformed lap it up like manna from heaven.

That is very obvious here in this forum, the sequence is read, swallow, rush in where angel fear to tread.

Have you read the HRC report poddster?

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
Glee

Yes, i understand the timing.

Hide what happened under Rudd, Gillard by highlighting only what happened under abbott..

---

That is an example of the same level of stubborn demonstrated by Senators Macdonald and O'Sullivan and is so far from the truth it's ridiculous.

Btw, it does not hide anything that happened under the previous govt.  It covers both.

---

@am*3 wrote:

Have you read the HRC report poddster?

---

Obviously not.  Nor did he see the interrogation of Triggs by the Senate committee.

---

@am*3 wrote:

Have you read the HRC report poddster?

---

Obviously not