---

@idlewhile wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Look up any poll that tickles your fancy.

---

Off topic....again or still, so I'll add my off topic reply, berries anyone?

---

Nup, still on topic.  The public opinion of scary Abbott.

Nuts, anyone?

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

---

@idlewhile wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Look up any poll that tickles your fancy.

---

Off topic....again or still, so I'll add my off topic reply, berries anyone?

---

Nup, still on topic.  The public opinion of scary Abbott.

 

Nuts, anyone?

---

Ah!  imitation is the best form of flattery when words fail.   Scabby the Rat Labors beloved  mascot.

Berries Scabby?

It makes you wonder when you have Muslim apologists coming out in supporrt of "Jihad John",

the guy who cuts off the heads for ISIS.

"Asim Qureshi, research director at lobby group CAGE, described the world's most wanted man as 'extremely kind, extremely gentle and the most humble young person that I ever knew'. At a press conference today Mr Qureshi was close to tears as he said Emwazi, who is linked to a string of executions of ISIS prisoners, 'was such a beautiful man' who was radicalised because the security services harassed him.  "

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2970521/Outrage-group-blames-MI5-radicalising-extremely-kind...

One of the victis daughters has it right

"The daughter of one of Jihadi John's victims said her family will not rest until there is a bullet between the killer's eyes"

ANOTHER LABOR BACK FLIP

Metadata retention laws will pass as Labor folds

The Federal Government's controversial $400 million plan to force telecommunications providers to store the metadata of all phone and internet users for two years will go ahead after the Labor party agreed to support the move.

The worst opposition in history just got worse.

We hardly hear a peep out of Shorten and now we get another back flip.

The Pressure must be too much for him.

Beltway Bill, out there every day emoting, empathising saying "everything will be so better under Labor".  

We'll see, his heart is not in accepting ANYTHING the govt. puts up, a hollow man,  even his own colleagues call him Showbag Bill, all show but nothing inside.

Anybody know what else they've got??? no..... sleazy politicking and disgraceful slurs, we see it every day in question time, they are not there for the country, they are only there to disrupt.

---

@vicr3000 wrote:

 

 

 

 

ANOTHER LABOR BACK FLIP

 

 

Metadata retention laws will pass as Labor folds

 

The Federal Government's controversial $400 million plan to force telecommunications providers to store the metadata of all phone and internet users for two years will go ahead after the Labor party agreed to support the move.

 

 

The worst opposition in history just got worse.

 

We hardly hear a peep out of Shorten and now we get another back flip.

 

The Pressure must be too much for him.

 

 

 

---

Do you think we really need these Metadat Retention laws when we have e-bay members doing a similar job because they don't like what other members say:

"I rang the national security hotline today..... we had a long chat about the posters on here that seem to support terrorism. ?... they took lots of notes and posters ids I mentioned....

Your 2 posts above just prove to all here just how much hate you have for australia... and our way of life....must be good sitting in the bondi castle hating us so much"

---

@tezza2844 wrote:

 

---

Do you think we really need these Metadat Retention laws when we have e-bay members doing a similar job because they don't like what other members say:

 

 

"I rang the national security hotline today..... we had a long chat about the posters on here that seem to support terrorism. ?... they took lots of notes and posters ids I mentioned....

Your 2 posts above just prove to all here just how much hate you have for australia... and our way of life....must be good sitting in the bondi castle hating us so much"

Can you please actually quote someone in the midst of your outrage? Because the way it reads (currently) your quote is something YOU did. 

People shouldn't have to go back and find verification on a forum. You state it, with real quotes.

@nevnreally wrote:

"Can you please actually quote someone in the midst of your outrage? Because the way it reads (currently) your quote is something YOU did.

People shouldn't have to go back and find verification on a forum. You state it, with real quotes."

Definitely not something I'd write, I'm not from the paranoid right.  Start with posts 6 & 8 of this thread, other quotes are not far behind.